Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul-Aug;60(4):264-9.
doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e318221b6e6.

Assessing fidelity to an intervention in a randomized controlled trial to improve medication adherence

Karen Wickersham  1 , Alison Colbert, Donna Caruthers, Lisa Tamres, Angela Martino, Judith A Erlen
Affiliations

Assessing fidelity to an intervention in a randomized controlled trial to improve medication adherence

Karen Wickersham et al. Nurs Res. 2011 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Behavioral intervention effectiveness in randomized controlled trials requires fidelity to the protocol. Fidelity assessment tools tailored to the intervention may strengthen intervention research.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the assessment of fidelity to the structured intervention protocol in an examination of a nurse-delivered telephone intervention designed to improve medication adherence.

Methods: Fidelity assessment included random selection and review of approximately 10% of the audiorecorded intervention sessions, stratified by interventionist and intervention session. Audiotapes were reviewed along with field notes for percentage of agreement, addressing whether key components were covered during the sessions. Visual analog scales were used to provide summary scores (0 = low to 5 = high) of interaction characteristics of the interventionists and participants with respect to engagement, demeanor, listening skills, attentiveness, and openness.

Results: Four nurse interventionists delivered 871 structured intervention sessions to 113 participants. Three trained graduate student researchers assessed 131 intervention sessions. The mean percentage of agreement was 92.0% (±10.5%), meeting the criteria of 90% congruence with the intervention protocol. The mean interventionist interaction summary score was 4.5 ± 0.4, and the mean participant interaction summary score was 4.5 ± 0.4.

Discussion: Overall, the interventionists successfully delivered the structured intervention content, with some variability in both the percentage of agreement and quality of interaction scores. Ongoing assessment aids in ensuring fidelity to study protocol and having reliable study results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intervention Fidelity Assessment: Sampling and Review Process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D…, Lang T. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2001;134:663–694. - PubMed
    1. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company; 1997.
    1. Bellg AJ, Borelli B, Resnick B, Hecht J, Minicucci DS, Ory M…, Czajkowski S. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychology. 2004;23(5):443–451. - PubMed
    1. Dumas JE, Lynch AM, Laughlin JE, Smith EP, Prinz RJ. Promoting intervention fidelity: Conceptual issues, methods, and preliminary results from the EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2001;20(1 Suppl):38–47. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances