Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;4(1):4-12.
doi: 10.4103/0974-2069.79616.

Global research priorities in rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease

Affiliations

Global research priorities in rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease

Jonathan R Carapetis et al. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

We now stand at a critical juncture for rheumatic fever (RF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) control. In recent years, we have seen a surge of interest in these diseases in regions of the world where RF/RHD mostly occur. This brings real opportunities to make dramatic progress in the next few years, but also real risks if we miss these opportunities. Most public health and clinical approaches in RF/RHD arose directly from programmes of research. Many unanswered questions remain, including those around how to implement what we know will work, so research will continue to be essential in our efforts to bring a global solution to this disease. Here we outline our proposed research priorities in RF/RHD for the coming decade, grouped under the following four challenges: Translating what we know already into practical RHD control; How to identify people with RHD earlier, so that preventive measures have a higher chance of success; Better understanding of disease pathogenesis, with a view to improved diagnosis and treatment of ARF and RHD; and Finding an effective approach to primary prevention. We propose a mixture of basic, applied, and implementation science. With concerted efforts, strong links to clinical and public health infrastructure, and advocacy and funding support from the international community, there are good prospects for controlling these RF and RHD over the next decade.

Keywords: Rheumatic fever; prevention; rheumatic heart disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO Technical Report Series; 923. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. WHO Expert Consultation on Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease (2001: Geneva Switzerland). Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation, Geneva, 29 October - 1 November 2001. - PubMed
    1. Rimoin AW, Hamza HS, Vince A, Kumar R, Walker CF, Chitale RA, et al. Evaluation of the WHO clinical decision rule for streptococcal pharyngitis. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90:1066–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carapetis JR, Steer AC, Mulholland EK. The current evidence for the burden of group A streptococcal diseases (WHO/FCH/CAH/05.07) Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
    1. Carapetis JR. Group A streptococcal vaccine development: Current status and issues of relevance to less developed countries (WHO/FCH/CAH/05.09 and WHO/IVB/05.14) Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
    1. Carapetis JR. A review of the technical basis for the current WHO approach to the control of conditions associated with group A streptococcal infections (WHO/FCH/CAH/05.08) Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.