Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;23(1):54-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jun 15.

Reconciling incongruous qualitative and quantitative findings in mixed methods research: exemplars from research with drug using populations

Affiliations

Reconciling incongruous qualitative and quantitative findings in mixed methods research: exemplars from research with drug using populations

Karla D Wagner et al. Int J Drug Policy. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Mixed methods research is increasingly being promoted in the health sciences as a way to gain more comprehensive understandings of how social processes and individual behaviours shape human health. Mixed methods research most commonly combines qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis strategies. Often, integrating findings from multiple methods is assumed to confirm or validate the findings from one method with the findings from another, seeking convergence or agreement between methods. Cases in which findings from different methods are congruous are generally thought of as ideal, whilst conflicting findings may, at first glance, appear problematic. However, the latter situation provides the opportunity for a process through which apparently discordant results are reconciled, potentially leading to new emergent understandings of complex social phenomena. This paper presents three case studies drawn from the authors' research on HIV risk amongst injection drug users in which mixed methods studies yielded apparently discrepant results. We use these case studies (involving injection drug users [IDUs] using a Needle/Syringe Exchange Program in Los Angeles, CA, USA; IDUs seeking to purchase needle/syringes at pharmacies in Tijuana, Mexico; and young street-based IDUs in San Francisco, CA, USA) to identify challenges associated with integrating findings from mixed methods projects, summarize lessons learned, and make recommendations for how to more successfully anticipate and manage the integration of findings. Despite the challenges inherent in reconciling apparently conflicting findings from qualitative and quantitative approaches, in keeping with others who have argued in favour of integrating mixed methods findings, we contend that such an undertaking has the potential to yield benefits that emerge only through the struggle to reconcile discrepant results and may provide a sum that is greater than the individual qualitative and quantitative parts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agar M. Recasting the “Ethno” in “Epidemiology”. Medical Anthropology. 1997;16:391–403. - PubMed
    1. Bazeley P. Integrating Data Analyses in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2009;3(3):203–207.
    1. Bluthenthal RN, Kral AH, Lorvick J, Watters JK. Impact of Law Enforcement on Syringe Exchange Programs: A Look at Oakland and San Francisco. Medical Anthropology. 1997;18(1):61–83. - PubMed
    1. Bourgois P. Anthropology and Epidemiology on Drugs: The Challenges of Cross-Methodological and Theoretical Dialogue. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2002;13:259–269.
    1. Bourgois P, Martinez A, Kral A, Edlin BR, Schonberg J, Ciccarone D. Reinterpreting Ethnic Patterns Among White and African American Men Who Inject Heroin: A Social Science of Medicine Approach. PLoS Med. 2006;3(10):e452. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms