This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Editorial

. 2011 Jul 1;78(1):20-2.

doi: 10.1002/ccd.23245.

Comparison between thrombus removal devices: aspirations meet reality

On Topaz

PMID: 21681889
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23245

Editorial

Comparison between thrombus removal devices: aspirations meet reality

On Topaz. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011.

. 2011 Jul 1;78(1):20-2.

doi: 10.1002/ccd.23245.

Author

On Topaz

PMID: 21681889
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23245

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

A randomized comparison of manual versus mechanical thrombus removal in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (TREAT-MI).
Vink MA, Patterson MS, van Etten J, Ijsselmuiden AJ, Dirksen MT, Amoroso G, Slagboom T, Laarman G, Kiemeneij F. Vink MA, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jul 1;78(1):14-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22932. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011. PMID: 21681888 Clinical Trial.

Publication types

Actions
Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
- Wiley
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information