Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: twist drills versus piezosurgery. A single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial
- PMID: 21682844
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00341.x
Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: twist drills versus piezosurgery. A single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of the present investigation was to longitudinally monitor stability changes of implants inserted using traditional rotary instruments or piezoelectric inserts, and to follow their variations during the first 90 days of healing.
Materials and methods: A randomized, controlled trial was conducted on 20 patients. Each patient received two identical, adjacent implants in the upper premolar area: the test site was prepared with piezosurgery, and the control site was prepared using twist drills. Resonance frequency analysis measurements were taken by a blinded operator on the day of surgery and after 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 56, and 90 days.
Results: At 90 days, 39 out of 40 implants were osseointegrated (one failure in the control group). Both groups showed an initial decrease in mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) values: a shift in implant stability to increasing ISQ values occurred after 14 days in the test group and after 21 days in the control group. The lowest mean ISQ value was recorded at 14 days for test implants (97.3% of the primary stability) and at 21 days for the control implants (90.8% of the primary stability). ISQ variations with respect to primary stability differed significantly between the two groups during the entire period of observation: from day 14 to day 42, in particular, the differences were extremely significant (p < .0001). All 39 implants were in function successfully at the visit scheduled 1 year after insertion.
Conclusions: The findings from this study suggest that ultrasonic implant site preparation results in a limited decrease of ISQ values and in an earlier shifting from a decreasing to an increasing stability pattern, when compared with the traditional drilling technique. From a clinical point of view, implants inserted with the piezoelectric technique demonstrated a short-term clinical success similar to those inserted using twist drills.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Clinical analysis of the stability of dental implants after preparation of the site by conventional drilling or piezosurgery.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Feb;52(2):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Nov 20. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24268822 Clinical Trial.
-
Piezoelectric vs. conventional drilling in implant site preparation: pilot controlled randomized clinical trial with crossover design.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Dec;25(12):1336-43. doi: 10.1111/clr.12278. Epub 2013 Oct 21. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014. PMID: 24147994 Clinical Trial.
-
Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial.J Periodontol. 2005 Mar;76(3):391-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.391. J Periodontol. 2005. PMID: 15857073 Clinical Trial.
-
Implant stability using piezoelectric bone surgery compared with conventional drilling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Nov;47(11):1453-1464. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 31. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018. PMID: 29615293
-
Piezoelectric surgery versus conventional drilling for implant site preparation: a meta-analysis.J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Oct;62(4):391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 26. J Prosthodont Res. 2018. PMID: 29843978 Review.
Cited by
-
Implant stability in different techniques of surgical sites preparation: an in vitro study.Oral Implantol (Rome). 2014 Dec 27;7(2):33-9. eCollection 2014 Apr-Jun. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2014. PMID: 25694799 Free PMC article.
-
Dental implant site preparation with conventional rotary drill or piezosurgery: five-year after placement results from a within person randomised controlled trial.Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Dec 18;10(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00582-7. Int J Implant Dent. 2024. PMID: 39692785 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Immediate Loading of Implant-Supported Single Crowns after Conventional and Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Biomed Res Int. 2018 Aug 14;2018:6817154. doi: 10.1155/2018/6817154. eCollection 2018. Biomed Res Int. 2018. PMID: 30186865 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Correlation between Insertion Torque and Implant Stability Quotient in Tapered Implants with Knife-Edge Thread Design.Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 15;2018:7201093. doi: 10.1155/2018/7201093. eCollection 2018. Biomed Res Int. 2018. PMID: 29862286 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Implant Macro-Design and Magnetodynamic Surgical Preparation on Primary Implant Stability: An In Vitro Investigation.Dent J (Basel). 2023 Sep 24;11(10):227. doi: 10.3390/dj11100227. Dent J (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37886912 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical