Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparency
- PMID: 21682893
- PMCID: PMC3132155
- DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-42
Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparency
Abstract
Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs are an issue of high priority for policy makers, legislators, health care professionals, industry leaders, academics and patients. This study aims to conduct a literature review to provide insight into the drivers of orphan drug pricing and reimbursement. Although orphan drug pricing follows the same economic logic as drug pricing in general, the monopolistic power of orphan drugs results in high prices: a) orphan drugs benefit from a period of marketing exclusivity; b) few alternative health technologies are available; c) third-party payers and patients have limited negotiating power; d) manufacturers attempt to maximise orphan drug prices within the constraints of domestic pricing and reimbursement policies; and e) substantial R&D costs need to be recouped from a small number of patients. Although these conditions apply to some orphan drugs, they do not apply to all orphan drugs. Indeed, the small number of patients treated with an orphan drug and the limited economic viability of orphan drugs can be questioned in a number of cases. Additionally, manufacturers have an incentive to game the system by artificially creating monopolistic market conditions. Given their high price for an often modest effectiveness, orphan drugs are unlikely to provide value for money. However, additional criteria are used to inform reimbursement decisions in some countries. These criteria may include: the seriousness of the disease; the availability of other therapies to treat the disease; and the cost to the patient if the medicine is not reimbursed. Therefore, the maximum cost per unit of outcome that a health care payer is willing to pay for a drug could be set higher for orphan drugs to which society attaches a high social value. There is a need for a transparent and evidence-based approach towards orphan drug pricing and reimbursement. Such an approach should be targeted at demonstrating the relative effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and economic viability of orphan drugs with a view to informing pricing and reimbursement decisions.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Paying for the Orphan Drug System: break or bend? Is it time for a new evaluation system for payers in Europe to take account of new rare disease treatments?Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012 Sep 26;7:74. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-74. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012. PMID: 23013790 Free PMC article.
-
A review of international coverage and pricing strategies for personalized medicine and orphan drugs.Health Policy. 2017 Dec;121(12):1240-1248. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 29. Health Policy. 2017. PMID: 29033060 Review.
-
Access to orphan drugs in Europe: current and future issues.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Feb;12(1):23-9. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.95. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012. PMID: 22280193
-
Reimbursement of orphan drugs in Belgium: what (else) matters?Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014 Sep 12;9:139. doi: 10.1186/s13023-014-0139-z. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014. PMID: 25208770 Free PMC article.
-
Orphan drugs policies: a suitable case for treatment.Eur J Health Econ. 2014 May;15(4):335-40. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0560-1. Eur J Health Econ. 2014. PMID: 24435513 Review.
Cited by
-
Differences in Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios for Common Versus Rare Conditions: A Case from Oncology.Pharmacoecon Open. 2017 Sep;1(3):167-173. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0022-7. Pharmacoecon Open. 2017. PMID: 29441496 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence quality and uncertainties considered in appraisal documents of drugs for rare diseases in England and Germany: a data extraction protocol.BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 16;15(2):e089418. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089418. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 39956595 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry disease.Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013 Feb 19;8:29. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-29. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013. PMID: 23421808 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with positive and negative recommendations for cancer and non-cancer drugs for rare diseases in Canada.Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jun 7;14(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1104-7. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019. PMID: 31174574 Free PMC article.
-
Common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in Canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in Quebec, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand.Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 Jan 30;13(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0759-9. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018. PMID: 29382371 Free PMC article.
References
-
- European Commission. Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products. Official Journal of the European Communities. 2000. L 18/1.
-
- Orphanet. The portal for rare diseases and orphan drugs. Orphanet. 2011. pp. 9–5. 2011. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
-
- Alcimed. Study on orphan drugs. Phase I: overview of the conditions for marketing orphan drugs in Europe. Koning Boudewijnstichting. 2006. pp. 18–3. 2010. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
-
- Denis A, Simoens S, Fostier C, Mergaert L, Cleemput I. Health technology assessment policy governing orphan diseases and orphan medicines. Brussels, Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; 2009. Ref Type: Report.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical