Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;72(4):678-84.
doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.678.

Alcohol use and problem severity: associations with dual systems of self-control

Robert D Dvorak  1 , Jeffrey S Simons, Tyler B Wray
Affiliations

Alcohol use and problem severity: associations with dual systems of self-control

Robert D Dvorak et al. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The current study tested the associations between a dual-systems model of self-control and alcohol use and problem severity.

Method: The sample consisted of 491 college students (77.0% women) from a rural state university. Participants completed a series of online surveys that assessed aspects of self-control, alcohol consumption, and alcohol-related problems.

Results: A confirmatory factor analysis model indicated two moderately correlated factors of poor control and good self-control. Poor control was positively associated with both alcohol use and problem severity. Good self-control had a negative association with problem severity. Good self-control moderated the association between poor control and alcohol use as well as between poor control and problem severity. The association between poor control and alcohol use was stronger at low levels of good self-control, whereas at high levels of good self-control, the effect of poor control was weaker and not significant. The interaction predicting problem severity was different: There was a negative association between good self-control and problem severity at low levels of poor control, and this effect diminished as poor control increased.

Conclusions: The results suggest that multidimensional models of self-control may be useful in understanding problematic alcohol use and may be beneficial for prevention and intervention efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural model depicting pathways from good self-control and poor control to number of standard alcoholic drinks consumed per week and number of alcohol-related problems over the last 6 months. Italicized coefficients are incident rate ratios. Coefficients in parentheses are odds ratios representing the likelihood of being in the always-zero groups. Correlation between latent variables is r = -.31, p < .001. Gender is included in the model although not depicted in the diagram. Good Self-Control (GSC) × Poor Control (PC) is a latent variable interaction between good self-control and poor control. N.S. = not significant. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Simple slopes of alcohol problem severity over the last 6 months on poor control at ±1 SD good self-control.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newburg Park, CA: Sage; 1991.
    1. Carver CS. Impulse and constraint: Perspectives from personality psychology, convergence with theory in other areas, and potential for integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2005;9:312–333. - PubMed
    1. Chen K, Sheth AJ, Elliott DK, Yeager A. Prevalence and correlates of past-year substance use, abuse, and dependence in a suburban community sample of high-school students. Addictive Behaviors. 2004;29:413–423. - PubMed
    1. Dimeff LA, Baer JS, Kivlahan DR, Marlatt GA. Brief alcohol screening and intervention for college students (BASICS): A harm reduction approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1999.
    1. Dvorak RD, Simons JS. Moderation of resource depletion in the self-control strength model: Differing effects of two modes of self-control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2009;35:572–583. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms