How payment systems affect physicians' provision behaviour--an experimental investigation
- PMID: 21683460
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.05.001
How payment systems affect physicians' provision behaviour--an experimental investigation
Abstract
Understanding how physicians respond to incentives from payment schemes is a central concern in health economics research. We introduce a controlled laboratory experiment to analyse the influence of incentives from fee-for-service and capitation payments on physicians' supply of medical services. In our experiment, physicians choose quantities of medical services for patients with different states of health. We find that physicians provide significantly more services under fee-for-service than under capitation. Patients are overserved under fee-for-service and underserved under capitation. However, payment incentives are not the only motivation for physicians' quantity choices, as patients' health benefits are of considerable importance as well. We find that patients in need of a high (low) level of medical services receive larger health benefits under fee-for-service (capitation).
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The Effects of Introducing Mixed Payment Systems for Physicians: Experimental Evidence.Health Econ. 2017 Feb;26(2):243-262. doi: 10.1002/hec.3292. Epub 2015 Dec 28. Health Econ. 2017. PMID: 26708170
-
Operating on commission: analyzing how physician financial incentives affect surgery rates.Health Econ. 2010 May;19(5):562-80. doi: 10.1002/hec.1495. Health Econ. 2010. PMID: 19399752
-
Family physician perception of economic incentives for the provision of office procedures.Fam Med. 1997 May;29(5):318-20. Fam Med. 1997. PMID: 9165282
-
Physicians' financial incentives in five dimensions: a conceptual framework for HMO managers.Health Care Manage Rev. 1999 Winter;24(1):57-72. Health Care Manage Rev. 1999. PMID: 10047979 Review.
-
Utilization control in HMOs.Q Rev Econ Finance. 1992 Autumn;32(3):31-53. Q Rev Econ Finance. 1992. PMID: 10122876 Review.
Cited by
-
Social preferences of future physicians.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):E10291-E10300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705451114. Epub 2017 Nov 16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017. PMID: 29146826 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the factors impacting physicians' attitudes toward health information exchange with patients in Jordanian hospitals.J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Jan 17;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00514-7. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023. PMID: 36650610 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing social preferences in reimbursement negotiations for new Pharmaceuticals in Oncology: an experimental design to analyse willingness to pay and willingness to accept.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 16;21(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06231-8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 33726735 Free PMC article.
-
Access to Norwegian healthcare system - challenges for sub-Saharan African immigrants.Int J Equity Health. 2019 Aug 14;18(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1027-x. Int J Equity Health. 2019. PMID: 31412853 Free PMC article.
-
Weak association between socioeconomic Care Need Index and primary care visits per registered patient in three Swedish regions.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021 Sep;39(3):288-295. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1928836. Epub 2021 Jun 7. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021. PMID: 34096820 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources