The supreme court and the sentencing of juveniles in the United States: reaffirming the distinctiveness of youth
- PMID: 21683911
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chc.2011.03.011
The supreme court and the sentencing of juveniles in the United States: reaffirming the distinctiveness of youth
Abstract
The US Supreme Court has set 2 key constitutionally based limits to punishment of juveniles; a bar on the imposition of the death penalty for crimes committed by juveniles and of life imprisonment without possibility of parole for juveniles who commit nonhomicide offenses. Both decisions held that these penalties were disproportionate given juveniles' distinctive characteristics. The Court's adoption of a developmental model of culpability may produce future challenges to lengthy juvenile sentences, broad provisions allowing transfer of juveniles for trial as adults, and even possibly to younger juveniles'competence to stand trial.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Law & psychiatry: punishing juveniles who kill.Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Oct;63(10):956-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.631012. Psychiatr Serv. 2012. PMID: 23032673
-
Juveniles who sexually offend: recommending a treatment program and level of care.Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011 Jul;20(3):413-29. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2011.03.007. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011. PMID: 21683910 Review.
-
Missouri overrules the United States Supreme Court on capital punishment for minors.J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2004;32(4):443-6. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2004. PMID: 15704630
-
The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: implementing Atkins v. Virginia.J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2004;32(3):304-8. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2004. PMID: 15515919
-
Forensic aspects of juvenile violence.Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2000 Oct;9(4):859-81. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2000. PMID: 11005010 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources