Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb 16:2:26.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00026. eCollection 2011.

Immunity to Francisella

Affiliations

Immunity to Francisella

Siobhán C Cowley et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

In recent years, studies on the intracellular pathogen Francisella tularensis have greatly intensified, generating a wealth of new information on the interaction of this organism with the immune system. Here we review the basic elements of the innate and adaptive immune responses that contribute to protective immunity against Francisella species, with special emphasis on new data that has emerged in the last 5 years. Most studies have utilized the mouse model of infection, although there has been an expansion of work on human cells and other new animal models. In mice, basic immune parameters that operate in defense against other intracellular pathogen infections, such as interferon gamma, TNF-α, and reactive nitrogen intermediates, are central for control of Francisella infection. However, new important immune mediators have been revealed, including IL-17A, Toll-like receptor 2, and the inflammasome. Further, a variety of cell types in addition to macrophages are now recognized to support Francisella growth, including epithelial cells and dendritic cells. CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells are clearly important for control of primary infection and vaccine-induced protection, but new T cell subpopulations and the mechanisms employed by T cells are only beginning to be defined. A significant role for B cells and specific antibodies has been established, although their contribution varies greatly between bacterial strains of lower and higher virulence. Overall, recent data profile a pathogen that is adept at subverting host immune responses, but susceptible to many elements of the immune system's antimicrobial arsenal.

Keywords: Francisella; adaptive; cytokine; immunity; innate; lymphocyte.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Components of murine innate and adaptive immune responses to Francisella. (1) The initial interaction of Francisella with host cells, such as macrophages, dendritic cells, epithelial cells, and endothelial cells, stimulates production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (2a) in a manner that is dependent upon MyD88, TLR2, and other unidentified receptors that signal through MyD88. Bacterial DNA engagement of the NOD-like receptor (NLR) AIM2 may also be critical for inflammasome assembly and release of IL-1β. Simultaneously, important innate immune cells recruited to the area of infection produce effector cytokines such as IL-12p40, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-17A (2b) that influence T cell development (3), and induce host cell production of antimicrobial molecules (4). In addition to the classic TH1-type cytokines, other mediators include mast cell production of IL-4, which can directly inhibit Francisella intramacrophage growth, and B-1a B cell production of anti-LPS antibodies that limit intraperitoneal infection. PMNs are essential for survival of Francisella infections initiated via some routes, but fail to eradicate intracellular organisms in vitro, so their contribution to infection remains unclear. After several days, activation and expansion of Francisella-specific T cells and B cells occurs (3). αβ T cells are essential for clearance of primary infection, and produce effector cytokines such as IL-17A and IFN-γ, as well as the membrane-bound and soluble forms of TNF-α. These factors presumably amplify and extend activation of infected host cells to limit Francisella intracellular growth through production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates, as well as other unidentified antimicrobials (4). Asterisks (*) indicate host cells that have been shown to harbor intracellular Francisella. The blue box indicates cell types that are neither fully innate nor adaptive, based on classical definitions.

References

    1. Abplanalp A. L., Morris I. R., Parida B. K., Teale J. M., Berton M. T. (2009). TLR-dependent control of Francisella tularensis infection and host inflammatory responses. PLoS ONE 4, e7920. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007920 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahlund M. K., Ryden P., Sjöstedt A., Stöven S. (2010). Directed screen of Francisella novicida virulence determinants using Drosophila melanogaster. Infect. Immun. 78, 3118–3128 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersson H., Hartmanova B., Back E., Eliasson H., Landfors M., Naslund L., Ryden P., Sjostedt A. (2006a). Transcriptional profiling of the peripheral blood response during tularemia. Genes Immun. 7, 503–513 10.1038/sj.gene.6364321 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersson H., Hartmanova B., Kuolee R., Ryden P., Conlan W., Chen W., Sjostedt A. (2006b). Transcriptional profiling of host responses in mouse lungs following aerosol infection with type A Francisella tularensis. J. Med. Microbiol. 55, 263–271 10.1099/jmm.0.46313-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anthony L. D., Burke R. D., Nano F. E. (1991). Growth of Francisella spp. in rodent macrophages. Infect. Immun. 59, 3291–3296 - PMC - PubMed