Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Sep;38(9):1691-701.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1842-9. Epub 2011 Jun 18.

Value of a Dixon-based MR/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Value of a Dixon-based MR/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions

Matthias Eiber et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, the potential contribution of Dixon-based MR imaging with a rapid low-resolution breath-hold sequence, which is a technique used for MR-based attenuation correction (AC) for MR/positron emission tomography (PET), was evaluated for anatomical correlation of PET-positive lesions on a 3T clinical scanner compared to low-dose CT. This technique is also used in a recently installed fully integrated whole-body MR/PET system.

Methods: Thirty-five patients routinely scheduled for oncological staging underwent (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and a 2-point Dixon 3-D volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) T1-weighted MR sequence on the same day. Two PET data sets reconstructed using attenuation maps from low-dose CT (PET(AC_CT)) or simulated MR-based segmentation (PET(AC_MR)) were evaluated for focal PET-positive lesions. The certainty for the correlation with anatomical structures was judged in the low-dose CT and Dixon-based MRI on a 4-point scale (0-3). In addition, the standardized uptake values (SUVs) for PET(AC_CT) and PET(AC_MR) were compared.

Results: Statistically, no significant difference could be found concerning anatomical localization for all 81 PET-positive lesions in low-dose CT compared to Dixon-based MR (mean 2.51 ± 0.85 and 2.37 ± 0.87, respectively; p = 0.1909). CT tended to be superior for small lymph nodes, bone metastases and pulmonary nodules, while Dixon-based MR proved advantageous for soft tissue pathologies like head/neck tumours and liver metastases. For the PET(AC_CT)- and PET(AC_MR)-based SUVs (mean 6.36 ± 4.47 and 6.31 ± 4.52, respectively) a nearly complete concordance with a highly significant correlation was found (r = 0.9975, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Dixon-based MR imaging for MR AC allows for anatomical allocation of PET-positive lesions similar to low-dose CT in conventional PET/CT. Thus, this approach appears to be useful for future MR/PET for body regions not fully covered by diagnostic MRI due to potential time constraints.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009 Jun;53(3):241-7 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(8):1345-51 - PubMed
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997 Nov-Dec;7(6):1132-9 - PubMed
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Sep;24(3):489-98 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 2008 Nov;49(11):1875-83 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources