Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):856-60.
doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2011.0738.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.

Effect of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium SF68 on presence of diarrhea in cats and dogs housed in an animal shelter

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium SF68 on presence of diarrhea in cats and dogs housed in an animal shelter

S N Bybee et al. J Vet Intern Med. 2011 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Beneficial effects of probiotics have never been analyzed in an animal shelter.

Hypothesis: Dogs and cats housed in an animal shelter and administered a probiotic are less likely to have diarrhea of ≥2 days duration than untreated controls.

Animals: Two hundred and seventeen cats and 182 dogs.

Methods: Double blinded and placebo controlled. Shelter dogs and cats were housed in 2 separate rooms for each species. For 4 weeks, animals in 1 room for each species was fed Enterococcus faecium SF68 while animals in the other room were fed a placebo. After a 1-week washout period, the treatments by room were switched and the study continued an additional 4 weeks. A standardized fecal score system was applied to feces from each animal every day by a blinded individual. Feces of animals with and without diarrhea were evaluated for enteric parasites. Data were analyzed by a generalized linear mixed model using a binomial distribution with treatment being a fixed effect and the room being a random effect.

Results: The percentage of cats with diarrhea ≥2 days was significantly lower (P = .0297) in the probiotic group (7.4%) when compared with the placebo group (20.7%). Statistical differences between groups of dogs were not detected but diarrhea was uncommon in both groups of dogs during the study.

Conclusion and clinical importance: Cats fed SF68 had fewer episodes of diarrhea of ≥2 days when compared with controls suggests the probiotic may have beneficial effects on the gastrointestinal tract.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution frequency of diarrhea (fecal score ≥ 4) based on treatment group over the study period in cats. There were no overall differences between groups (P= .5295).

References

    1. Pedersen NC, Sato R, Foley JE, et al Common virus infections in cats, before and after being placed in shelters, with emphasis on feline enteric coronavirus. J Feline Med Surg 2004;6:83–88. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hackett T, Lappin MR. Prevalence of enteric pathogens in dogs of North‐Central Colorado. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2003;39:52–56. - PubMed
    1. Buogo C, Burnens AP, Perrin J, et al Presence of Campylobacter spp. Clostridium difficile, C. perfringens and salmonellae in litters of puppies and in adult dogs in a shelter. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 1995;137:165–171. - PubMed
    1. Schrezenmeir J, de Vrese M. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics—Approaching a definition. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:361S–364S. - PubMed
    1. Sanders ME. Probiotics: Considerations for human health. Nutr Rev 2003;61:91–99. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types