Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Sep 10;63(10-11):923-42.
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.05.019. Epub 2011 Jun 13.

Intestinal lymphatic transport for drug delivery

Affiliations
Review

Intestinal lymphatic transport for drug delivery

Jaime A Yáñez et al. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. .

Abstract

Intestinal lymphatic transport has been shown to be an absorptive pathway following oral administration of lipids and an increasing number of lipophilic drugs, which once absorbed, diffuse across the intestinal enterocyte and while in transit associate with secretable enterocyte lipoproteins. The chylomicron-associated drug is then secreted from the enterocyte into the lymphatic circulation, rather than the portal circulation, thus avoiding the metabolically-active liver, but still ultimately returning to the systemic circulation. Because of this parallel and potentially alternative absorptive pathway, first-pass metabolism can be reduced while increasing lymphatic drug exposure, which opens the potential for novel therapeutic modalities and allows the implementation of lipid-based drug delivery systems. This review discusses the physiological features of the lymphatics, enterocyte uptake and metabolism, links between drug transport and lipid digestion/re-acylation, experimental model (in vivo, in vitro, and in silico) of lymphatic transport, and the design of lipid- or prodrug-based drug delivery systems for enhancing lymphatic drug transport.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Drug absorption via the intestinal lymphatic system and portal vein. FA = fatty acid, MG = monoglyceride, TG = triglyceride, LP = lipoprotein.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic diagram describing the sequential steps in the digestion of lipids and absorption via de portal blood and intestinal lymphatics.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cumulative lymphatic transport of halofantrine (Hf) (percentage of administered dose, mean ± SE) in thoracic lymph duct-cannulated dogs after fasted administration (open symbols, n = 3) or post-prandial administration (closed symbols, n = 4) of 100 mg halofantrine (free base).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Schematic representation of the double jeopardy theory. Substrates are represented by triangles whereas products of enzymes or metabolites are represented by pentagons.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Types of lipidic carriers: fatty acids, glycerides and phospholipids. In the case of fatty acids, the drug is attached directly to the carboxylate or to a modified ω-atom. Drug-glycerides conjugates are represented here by a 1,3-diglyceride where the drug is in position-2. Phospholipid prodrugs consist either in drugs linked to the phosphate group or to the glycerol backbone, in this case, the drug replaces a fatty acid.

References

    1. Charman W.N., Stella V.J. Estimating the maximum potential for intestinal lymphatic transport of lipophillic drug molecules. Int. J. Pharm. 1986;34:175–178.
    1. Trevaskis N.L., Charman W.N., Porter C.J. Lipid-based delivery systems and intestinal lymphatic drug transport: a mechanistic update. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008;60:702–716. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nordskog B.K., Phan C.T., Nutting D.F., Tso P. An examination of the factors affecting intestinal lymphatic transport of dietary lipids. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001;50:21–44. - PubMed
    1. Cense H.A., van Eijck C.H., Tilanus H.W. New insights in the lymphatic spread of oesophageal cancer and its implications for the extent of surgical resection. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2006;20:893–906. - PubMed
    1. Arya M., Bott S.R., Shergill I.S., Ahmed H.U., Williamson M., Patel H.R. The metastatic cascade in prostate cancer. Surg. Oncol. 2006;15:117–128. - PubMed