Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Jul;118(1):148-155.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821fd5b0.

Cervical length screening with ultrasound-indicated cerclage compared with history-indicated cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: a meta-analysis

Vincenzo Berghella  1 , A Dhanya Mackeen
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Cervical length screening with ultrasound-indicated cerclage compared with history-indicated cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: a meta-analysis

Vincenzo Berghella et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To compare pregnancy outcomes in singleton gestations with prior preterm birth that were managed either by cervical length screening with cerclage for short cervical length or history-indicated cerclage. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for the terms "cerclage," "randomized trial," and "clinical trial" from 1966 until January 2011. No restrictions for language were applied. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials of singleton gestations with prior preterm birth. Management by policy of transvaginal ultrasonography cervical length screening with cerclage placement for cervical shortening was compared with history-indicated cerclage.

Tabulation, integration, and results: Four randomized trials met inclusion criteria, including 467 women. In women with a singleton gestation and prior preterm birth, cervical length screening with cerclage for short cervical length was associated with similar incidences of preterm birth before 37 weeks (31% compared with 32%, relative risk 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.29), preterm birth before 34 weeks (17% compared with 23%, relative risk 0.76, 95% CI 0.48-1.20), and perinatal mortality (5% compared with 3%, relative risk 1.77, 95% CI 0.58-5.35) compared with history-indicated cerclage. In the transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening group, 42% developed a short cervical length and received cerclage.

Conclusion: Singleton gestations in women with prior preterm birth may be monitored safely with a policy of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening as compared with a policy of routine history-indicated cerclage. Cerclage can be reserved for the minority of women who develop a short cervical length.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dor J, Shalev J, Mashiach S, Blankstein J, Serr DM. Elective cervical suture of twin pregnancies diagnosed ultrasonically in the first trimester following induced ovulation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1982;13:55–60.
    1. Lazar P, Gueguen S. Multicentred controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at moderate risk of preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1984;91:731–5.
    1. Rush RW, McPherson K, Jones L, Chalmers I, Grant A. A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1984;91:724–30.
    1. Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomized trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1993;100:516–23.
    1. Ezechi OC, Kalu BK, Nwokoro CA. Prophylactic cerclage for the prevention of preterm delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004;85:283–4.