Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;12(2):192-7.

Financial impact of emergency department crowding

Mathew Foley  1 , Nizar Kifaieh, William K Mallon
Affiliations

Financial impact of emergency department crowding

Mathew Foley et al. West J Emerg Med. 2011 May.

Abstract

Objective: The economic benefits of reducing emergency department (ED) crowding are potentially substantial as they may decrease hospital length of stay. Hospital administrators and public officials may therefore be motivated to implement crowding protocols. We sought to identify a potential cost of ED crowding by evaluating the contribution of excess ED length of stay (LOS) to overall hospital length of stay.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of administrative data of adult patients from two urban hospitals (one county and one university) in Brooklyn, New York from 2006-2007. Data was provided by each facility. Extrapolating from prior research (Krochmal and Riley, 2005), we determined the increase in total hospital LOS due to extended ED lengths of stay, and applied cost and charge analyses for the two separate facilities.

Results: We determined that 6,205 (5.0%) admitted adult patients from the county facility and 3,017 (3.4%) patients from the university facility were held in the ED greater than one day over a one-year period. From prior research, it has been estimated that each of these patient's total hospital length of stay was increased on average by 11.7% (0.61 days at the county facility, and 0.71 days at the university facility). The increased charges over one year at the county facility due to the extended ED LOS was therefore approximately $9.8 million, while the increased costs at the university facility were approximately $3.9 million.

Conclusion: Based on extrapolations from Krochmal and Riley applied to two New York urban hospitals, the county hospital could potentially save $9.8 million in charges and the university hospital $3.9 million in costs per year if they eliminate ED boarding of adult admitted patients by improving movement to the inpatient setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Full capacity protocol (FCP) benefits. FCP, full capacity protocol, EMS, emergency medical services, ED, emergency department, MD, medical physician
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Handel DA, Sklar DP, Hollander JE, et al. Institute of Medicine/Association of American Medical Colleges Panelist Group Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Association of Academic Chairs in Emergency Medicine Panel. Executive summary: the Institute of Medicine report and the future of academic emergency medicine: the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine and Association of Academic Chairs in Emergency Medicine Panel: Association of American Medical Colleges annual meeting. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;14(3):261–7. - PubMed
    1. Innes G, Grafstein E, Stenstrom R, et al. Impact of an overcapacity care protocol on emergency department crowding. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(5):S85.
    1. Krochmal P, Riley TA. Increased health care costs associated with ED overcrowding. Am J Emerg Med. 1994 May;12(3):265–6. - PubMed
    1. Bayley MD, Schwartz JS, Shofer FS, et al. The financial burden of emergency department congestion and hospital crowding for chest pain patients awaiting admission. Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;45(2):110–7. - PubMed
    1. Falvo T, Grove L, Stachura R, et al. The opportunity loss of boarding admitted patients in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;14(4):332–7. - PubMed