Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jun;61(3):131-5.
doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00029.x.

Efficacy of an electric toothbrush on plaque control compared to two manual toothbrushes

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of an electric toothbrush on plaque control compared to two manual toothbrushes

Molook Torabi Parizi et al. Int Dent J. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare an electric toothbrush with two manual toothbrushes, in their relative efficacy to control plaque.

Design: Randomised clinical trial.

Setting: Kerman Dental School, Iran.

Participants: Forty-five volunteer dental students were randomly assigned to one of three groups. All subjects received a baseline plaque assessment using O'Leary plaque index, and then a prophylaxis to achieve the plaque index of zero. Subjects were trained to brush twice daily, with their assigned device and return after 1week and then after 2weeks for plaque assessment. Chi-squared and ANOVA were mainly used.

Main outcome measure: Plaque assessment using O'Leary plaque index.

Results: Although Jordan toothbrush consistently resulted in lower plaque indices compared to both manual toothbrushes, those differences were not statistically significant, F(2, 42)=2.45, P=0.10. Plaque reduction from week 1 to week 2 was significant in Jordan Power group (60%, from 13.46 to 5.44, P=0.010) and Panbehriz Classic group (53%, from 20.92 to 9.91, P=0.007).

Conclusion: The results of this study shows no evidence of statistically significant difference in respect to plaque control, between Jordan Power electric toothbrush and either of Oral-B Advantage or Panbehriz Classic manual brushes in a group of dental students after 2weeks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow of participants through each stage.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Plot of model estimated means for the three toothbrush groups for each of the three visits of the study (consider that all plaque indices were zeroed after baseline assessment).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Robinson PG, Deacon SA, Deery C, et al. Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;8(2):CD002281. - PubMed
    1. Deery C, Heanue M, Deacon S, et al. The effectiveness of manual versus powered toothbrushes for dental health: a systematic review. J Dent. 2004;32:197–211. - PubMed
    1. Cronin MJ, Dembling WZ, Cugini MA, et al. Three-month assessment of safety and efficacy of two electric toothbrushes. J Dent. 2005;33(Suppl. 1):23–28. - PubMed
    1. Sharma NC, Qaqish JG, Galustians HJ, et al. Plaque removal efficacy of two electric toothbrushes with different brush head designs. J Dent. 2005;33(Suppl. 1):17–21. - PubMed
    1. Hope CK, Wilson M. Comparison of the interproximal plaque removal efficacy of two powered toothbrushes using in vitro oral biofilms. Am J Dent. 2002;15:7B–11B. - PubMed

Publication types