Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation
- PMID: 21693771
- PMCID: PMC3233607
- DOI: 10.1177/1545968311408918
Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation
Abstract
Background: Although inpatient rehabilitation may enhance an individual's functional ability after stroke, it is not known whether these improvements are accompanied by an increase in daily use of the arms and legs.
Objectives: To determine the change in daily use of the upper and lower extremities of stroke patients during rehabilitation and to compare these values with that of community-dwelling older adults.
Methods: A total of 60 stroke patients underwent functional assessments and also wore 3 accelerometers for 3 consecutive weekdays on admission to rehabilitation and 3 weeks later prior to hospital discharge. The number of steps and upper-extremity activity counts were measured over the waking hours and during daily use for occupational therapy (OT) and physical therapy (PT) sessions. Healthy older adults (n = 40) also wore 3 accelerometers for 5 consecutive days.
Results: Stroke patients demonstrated a significant increase in mobility function, and this was accompanied by an increase in daily walking over the entire day as well as in PT. However, increases in daily walking were found predominantly in patients who were wheelchair users (and not walkers) at the time of admission. Control walking values (5202 steps) were more than 17 times that of stroke patients. Despite significant improvements in paretic hand function, no increase in daily use of the paretic or nonparetic hand was found over the entire day or in PT.
Conclusions: A disparity between functional recovery and increases in daily use of the upper and lower extremities was found during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Teasell R, Bayona N, Heitzner J. The Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation (EBRSR) reviews current practices in stroke rehabilitation 2008. Clinical Consequences of Stroke. Downloaded on July 22nd 2010 from URL: http://www.ebrsr.com/uploads/Module_2_clinical_consequences_final.pdf.
-
- Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–1794. - PubMed
-
- Boyd L, Winstein C. Explicit information interferes with implicit motor learning of both continuous and discrete movement tasks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006;30:46–57. - PubMed
-
- Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A, Donnan G. Inactive and alone; physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care. Stroke. 2004;35:1005–1009. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
