Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;6(6):e21041.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021041. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

The definition of insulin resistance using HOMA-IR for Americans of Mexican descent using machine learning

Affiliations

The definition of insulin resistance using HOMA-IR for Americans of Mexican descent using machine learning

Hui-Qi Qu et al. PLoS One. 2011.

Abstract

Objective: The lack of standardized reference range for the homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index has limited its clinical application. This study defines the reference range of HOMA-IR index in an adult Hispanic population based with machine learning methods.

Methods: This study investigated a Hispanic population of 1854 adults, randomly selected on the basis of 2000 Census tract data in the city of Brownsville, Cameron County. Machine learning methods, support vector machine (SVM) and Bayesian Logistic Regression (BLR), were used to automatically identify measureable variables using standardized values that correlate with HOMA-IR; K-means clustering was then used to classify the individuals by insulin resistance.

Results: Our study showed that the best cutoff of HOMA-IR for identifying those with insulin resistance is 3.80. There are 39.1% individuals in this Hispanic population with HOMA-IR>3.80.

Conclusions: Our results are dramatically different using the popular clinical cutoff of 2.60. The high sensitivity and specificity of HOMA-IR>3.80 for insulin resistance provide a critical fundamental for our further efforts to improve the public health of this Hispanic population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The ROC curve for the identification of the best cutoff value of HOMA-IR.
X-axis represents false positive (FP) rate (or 1-specificity); Y-axis represents true positive (TP) rate (sensitivity).

References

    1. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–419. - PubMed
    1. Greenfield MS, Doberne L, Kraemer F, Tobey T, Reaven G. Assessment of insulin resistance with the insulin suppression test and the euglycemic clamp. Diabetes. 1981;30:387–392. - PubMed
    1. Wallace TM, Levy JC, Matthews DR. Use and abuse of HOMA modeling. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1487–1495. - PubMed
    1. Fisher-Hoch SP, Rentfro AR, Salinas JJ, Perez A, Brown HS, et al. Socioeconomic status and prevalence of obesity and diabetes in a Mexican American community, Cameron County, Texas, 2004–2007. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7:A53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fan R-E, Chen P-H, Lin C-J. Working Set Selection Using Second Order Information for Training Support Vector Machines. J Mach Learn Res. 2005;6:1889–1918.

Publication types