Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Nov;80(5):407-14.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01739.x. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

Using Alzheimer's disease as a model for genetic risk disclosure: implications for personal genomics

Affiliations
Review

Using Alzheimer's disease as a model for genetic risk disclosure: implications for personal genomics

J S Roberts et al. Clin Genet. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Susceptibility testing for common, complex adult-onset diseases is projected to become more commonplace as the rapid pace of genomic discoveries continues, and evidence regarding the potential benefits and harms of such testing is needed to inform medical practice and health policy. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) testing for risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) provides a paradigm in which to examine the process and impact of disclosing genetic susceptibility for a prevalent, severe and incurable neurological condition. This review summarizes findings from a series of multi-site randomized clinical trials examining psychological and behavioral responses to various methods of genetic risk assessment for AD using APOE disclosure. We discuss challenges involved in disease risk estimation and communication and the extent to which participants comprehend and perceive utility in their genetic risk information. Findings on the psychological impact of test results are presented (e.g. distress), along with data on participants' health behavior and insurance purchasing responses (e.g. long-term care). Finally, we report comparisons of the safety and efficacy of intensive genetic counseling approaches to briefer models that emphasize streamlined processes and educational materials. The implications of these findings for the emerging field of personal genomics are discussed, with directions identified for future research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors report no conflicts related to the work presented herein.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample risk curve presented to REVEAL participants
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of participants receiving identical 29% numerical risk estimates that endorsed perceived risk survey items, stratified by risk disclosure group
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportion of participants in the first REVEAL Study trial reporting insurance change during 12 months following genetic risk disclosure, stratified by randomization status/APOE genotype and insurance domain

References

    1. Burke W, Psaty BM. Personalized medicine in the era of genomics. JAMA. 2007;298:1682–1684. - PubMed
    1. Urquidi V, Goodison S. Genomic signatures of breast cancer metastasis. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2007;118:116–129. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hudson K, Javitt G, Burke W, et al. ASHG statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:635–637. - PubMed
    1. Offit K. Genomic profiles for disease risk: Predictive or premature? JAMA. 2008;299:1353–1355. - PubMed
    1. Burke W. Clinical validity and clinical utility of genetic tests. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2009;60:9.15.11–19.15.17. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances