Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun 22:4:212.
doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-212.

Effective implementation of research into practice: an overview of systematic reviews of the health literature

Annette Boaz  1 , Juan Baeza, Alec Fraser; European Implementation Score Collaborative Group (EIS)
Affiliations

Effective implementation of research into practice: an overview of systematic reviews of the health literature

Annette Boaz et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: The gap between research findings and clinical practice is well documented and a range of interventions has been developed to increase the implementation of research into clinical practice.

Findings: A review of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the use of research in clinical practice. A search for relevant systematic reviews was conducted of Medline and the Cochrane Database of Reviews 1998-2009. 13 systematic reviews containing 313 primary studies were included. Four strategy types are identified: audit and feedback; computerised decision support; opinion leaders; and multifaceted interventions. Nine of the reviews reported on multifaceted interventions. This review highlights the small effects of single interventions such as audit and feedback, computerised decision support and opinion leaders. Systematic reviews of multifaceted interventions claim an improvement in effectiveness over single interventions, with effect sizes ranging from small to moderate. This review found that a number of published systematic reviews fail to state whether the recommended practice change is based on the best available research evidence.

Conclusions: This overview of systematic reviews updates the body of knowledge relating to the effectiveness of key mechanisms for improving clinical practice and service development. Multifaceted interventions are more likely to improve practice than single interventions such as audit and feedback. This review identified a small literature focusing explicitly on getting research evidence into clinical practice. It emphasizes the importance of ensuring that primary studies and systematic reviews are precise about the extent to which the reported interventions focus on changing practice based on research evidence (as opposed to other information codified in guidelines and education materials).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Data extraction information.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care.[see comment]. [Review] [103 refs] Lancet. 2003;362:1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Green LA, Seifert CM. Translation of research into practice: why we can't "just do it". J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005;18:541–545. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.18.6.541. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grimshaw J, McAuley LM, Bero L. Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2010;12:298–303. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L. et al.Changing provider behavior - An overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Medical Care. 2001;39:II2–II45. - PubMed
    1. Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. [Review] [64 refs] BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making. 2008;8:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-38. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources