Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun 23:6:56.
doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-6-56.

Unusual finding of endocervical-like mucinous epithelium in continuity with urothelium in endocervicosis of the urinary bladder

Affiliations

Unusual finding of endocervical-like mucinous epithelium in continuity with urothelium in endocervicosis of the urinary bladder

Phaik-Leng Cheah et al. Diagn Pathol. .

Abstract

Endocervicosis in the urinary bladder is a rare benign condition. We present a case in a 37-year-old woman with classical clinical and pathological features of endocervicosis. The unusual observation of endocervical-like mucinous epithelium in continuity with the urothelium in addition to fully developed endocervicosis prompted immunohistochemical profiling of the case using antibodies to cytokeratins (AE1/AE3, CK19, CK7, CK5/6, CK20), HBME-1, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) to assess the relationship of the surface mucinous and endocervicosis glandular epithelia. The surface mucinous epithelium, urothelium and endocervicosis glands were immunopositive for AE1/AE3, CK7 and CK19 while CK20 was only expressed by few urothelial umbrella cells. The surface mucinous epithelium was CK5/6 and HBME-1 immunonegative but showed presence of ER and PR. This was in contrast to the urothelium's expression of CK5/6 but not ER and PR. In comparison, endocervicosis glands expressed HBME-1, unlike the surface mucinous epithelium. The endocervicosis epithelium also demonstrated the expected presence of ER and PR and CK5/6 immunonegativity. The slightly differing immunohistochemical phenotypes of the surface mucinous and morphologically similar endocervicosis glandular epithelium is interesting and requires further clarification to its actual nature. The patient has remained well and without evidence of disease 18-months following transurethral resection of the lesion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histologic findings of the transurethral resected bladder tissue. (A) Endocervicosis showing round to branched endocervical-like glands with surrounding smooth muscle in the bladder (H + E × 40). (B) Surface mucinous epithelium delineated from urothelium (Southgate's mucicarmine x 40). (C) CK5/6 decorating basal cells of urothelium while surface mucinous epithelium is immunonegative (x 40). (D) Nuclear ER immunopositivity is noted in the surface mucinous epithelium and adjacent endocervicosis gland (x 40).

References

    1. Steele AA, Byrne AJ. Paramesonephric (mullerian) sinus of urinary bladder. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6:173–176. doi: 10.1097/00000478-198203000-00010. (1982) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clement PB, Young RH. Endocervicosis of the bladder. A report of six cases of a benign mullerian lesion that may mimic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992;16:533–542. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199206000-00001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Julie C, Boye K, Desgrippes A, Regnier A, Staroz F, Fontaine E, Franc B. Endocervicosis of the urinary bladder. Immunohistochemical comparative study between a new case and normal uterine cervices. Pathol Pract Res. 2002;198:115–120. doi: 10.1078/0344-0338-00197. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heretis J, Stamatiou K, Papadimitriou V, Giannikaki E, Stathopoulos E, Sofras F. Endocervicosis of the bladder: report of a case and review of the current literature. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2009;2:91–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hao H, Tsujimoto M, Tsubamoto H, Komori S, Hirota S. Immunohistochemical phenotype of the urinary bladder endocervicosis: comparison with normal endocervix and well-differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix. Pathol Int. 2010;60:528–532. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2010.02555.x. - DOI - PubMed