Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jun 23:12:56.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-56.

A cluster randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of a brief walking intervention delivered in primary care: study protocol

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A cluster randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of a brief walking intervention delivered in primary care: study protocol

David P French et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present research is to conduct a fully powered explanatory trial to evaluate the efficacy of a brief self-regulation intervention to increase walking. The intervention will be delivered in primary care by practice nurses (PNs) and Healthcare Assistants (HCAs) to patients for whom increasing physical activity is a particular priority. The intervention has previously demonstrated efficacy with a volunteer population, and subsequently went through an iterative process of refinement in primary care, to maximise acceptability to both providers and recipients.

Methods/design: This two arm cluster randomised controlled trial set in UK general practices will compare two strategies for increasing walking, assessed by pedometer, over six months. Patients attending practices randomised to the self-regulation intervention arm will receive an intervention consisting of behaviour change techniques designed to increase walking self-efficacy (confidence in ability to perform the behaviour), and to help people translate their "good" intentions into behaviour change by making plans. Patients attending practices randomised to the information provision arm will receive written materials promoting walking, and a short unstructured discussion about increasing their walking.The trial will recruit 20 PN/HCAs (10 per arm), who will be trained by the research team to deliver the self-regulation intervention or information provision control intervention, to 400 patients registered at their practices (20 patients per PN/HCA). This will provide 85% power to detect a mean difference of five minutes/day walking between the self-regulation intervention group and the information provision control group. Secondary outcomes include health services costs, and intervention effects in sub-groups defined by age, ethnicity, gender, socio-economic status, and clinical condition. A mediation analysis will investigate the extent to which changes in constructs specified by the Theory of Planned Behaviour lead to changes in objectively assessed walking behaviour.

Discussion: This trial addresses the current lack of evidence for interventions that are effective at increasing walking and that can be offered to patients in primary care. The intervention being evaluated has demonstrated efficacy, and has been through an extensive process of adaptation to ensure acceptability to both provider and recipient, thus optimising fidelity of intervention delivery and treatment receipt. It therefore provides a strong test of the hypothesis that a self-regulation intervention can help primary care patients increase their walking.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95932902.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart showing planned study recruitment numbers, and timing of intervention sessions and measurements.

References

    1. Department of Health. At least five a week: Evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationship to health. London; 2004.
    1. NHS Information Centre for health and social care. Health Survey for England - 2008: Physical activity and fitness. Leeds; 2009.
    1. Department of Health. Choosing activity: A physical activity action plan. London; 2005.
    1. Morris JN, Hardman AE. Walking to health. Sports Med. 1997;23:306–312. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199723050-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murphy MH, Nevill AM, Murtagh EM, Holder RL. The effect of walking on fitness, fatness and resting blood pressure: A meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials. Prev Med. 2007;44:377–385. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.12.008. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources