Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) plus registry experience
- PMID: 21700248
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.04.004
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) plus registry experience
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to assess outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main (LM) disease.
Background: Limited data are available on outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing LM PCI.
Methods: Of 9,075 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) Plus registry between 2005 and June 30, 2010, 6,666 underwent primary PCI. Of them, 348 (5.2%; mean age: 63.5 ± 12.6 years) underwent LM PCI, either isolated (n = 208) or concomitant to PCI for other vessel segments (n = 140). They were compared with 6,318 patients (94.8%; mean age: 61.9 ± 12.5 years) undergoing PCI of non-LM vessel segments only.
Results: The LM patients had higher rates of cardiogenic shock (12.2% vs. 3.5%; p < 0.001), cardiac arrest (10.6% vs. 6.3%; p < 0.01), in-hospital mortality (10.9% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.001), and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (12.4% vs. 5.0%; p < 0.001) than non-LM PCI. Rates of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were highest for concurrent LM and non-LM PCI (17.9% and 18.6%, respectively), intermediate for isolated LM PCI (6.3% and 8.3%, respectively), and lowest for non-LM PCI (3.8% and 5.0%, respectively). Rates of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events for LM PCI were higher than for non-LM multivessel PCI (10.9% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001, and 12.4% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001, respectively). LM disease independently predicted in-hospital death (odds ratio: 2.36; 95% confidence interval: 1.34 to 4.17; p = 0.003).
Conclusions: Emergent LM PCI in the context of acute myocardial infarction, even including 12% cardiogenic shock, appears to have a remarkably high (89%) in-hospital survival. Concurrent LM and non-LM PCI has worse outcomes than isolated LM PCI.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery disease as culprit lesion in patients with acute myocardial infarction.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun;4(6):618-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.02.016. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011. PMID: 21700247
-
Use and outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (from the EHS-PCI Registry).Am J Cardiol. 2012 Apr 1;109(7):941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.020. Epub 2012 Jan 9. Am J Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22236463
-
Relation of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio to coronary flow to in-hospital major adverse cardiac events in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention.Am J Cardiol. 2012 Sep 1;110(5):621-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.041. Epub 2012 May 18. Am J Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22608360
-
Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):814-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.010. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 23968700 Review.
-
Unprotected left main coronary disease and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a contemporary review and argument for percutaneous coronary intervention.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug;3(8):791-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.06.005. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010. PMID: 20723848 Review.
Cited by
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease - A Single Hospital Experience without On-Site Cardiac Surgery.Acta Cardiol Sin. 2015 Jul;31(4):267-79. doi: 10.6515/acs20150119d. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2015. PMID: 27122882 Free PMC article.
-
Prognosis of cardiogenic shock secondary to culprit left main coronary artery lesion-related myocardial infarction.ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;10(1):111-120. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14128. Epub 2022 Sep 24. ESC Heart Fail. 2023. PMID: 36151843 Free PMC article.
-
Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main closure during acute myocardial infarction.Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2015;11(2):150-1. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2015.52290. Epub 2015 Jun 22. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2015. PMID: 26161109 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cardiogenic shock due to left main related myocardial infarction: is revascularization enough?J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022 Feb 28;19(2):152-157. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.02.005. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 35317397 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
In-hospital outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention according to left ventricular ejection fraction.ARYA Atheroscler. 2014 Jul;10(4):211-7. ARYA Atheroscler. 2014. PMID: 25258637 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous