Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011;4(3):222-8.
doi: 10.1159/000329619. Epub 2011 Jun 9.

Comparison of education-only versus group-based intervention in promoting weight loss: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of education-only versus group-based intervention in promoting weight loss: a randomised controlled trial

Yoshio Nakata et al. Obes Facts. 2011.

Erratum in

  • Obes Facts. 2013;6(1):89-90

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of education-only versus group-based intervention in promoting weight loss.

Methods: Between April and October 2009, a 6-month randomised controlled trial was conducted at Mito Kyodo General Hospital in Japan (UMIN000001259). The participants were 188 overweight adults (145 women, 43 men) aged 40-65 years. They were randomly assigned to one of three groups: control, moderate or intensive intervention. A single motivational lecture was provided to all three groups, educational materials (textbooks, notebooks, and a pedometer) to the moderate and intensive intervention groups, and group-based support to the intensive intervention group. Amount of weight loss was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were components of metabolic syndrome.

Results: Mean ± SD weight loss of participants in the control, moderate and intensive intervention groups was 2.9 ± 4.1, 4.7 ± 4.0 and 7.7 ± 4.1 kg, respectively. Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons revealed all between-group differences to be significant (p < 0.05). Waist circumference decreased in the intensive intervention group more than in the other groups, whereas no significant differences were observed in the other secondary outcome measures.

Conclusion: Education-only intervention is a cost-effective method to promote weight loss. Adding group-based intervention further promotes weight loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of participant progress through the phases of the 6-month randomised trial.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pattern of change in body weight during 6-month intervention by treatment assignment. Each data point represents the mean value for all randomised participants with missing data replaced by the last observation carried forward. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Points and error bars are jittered horizontally to improve visibility.

References

    1. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Rastas M, Salminen V, Uusitupa M, Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1343–1350. - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association and National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases. The prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:742–749. - PubMed
    1. Wing RR, Behavioral interventions for obesity. recognizing our progress and future challenges. Obes Res. 2003;11((suppl)):3–6. - PubMed
    1. Dansinger ML, Tatsioni A, Wong JB, Chung M, Balk EM. Meta-analysis: the effect of dietary counseling for weight loss. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:41–50. - PubMed

Publication types