Comparison of meshed versus MEEK micrografted skin expansion rate: claimed, achieved, and polled results
- PMID: 21701314
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318217463a
Comparison of meshed versus MEEK micrografted skin expansion rate: claimed, achieved, and polled results
References
-
- Peeters R, Hubens A. The mesh skin graft: True expansion rate. Burns Incl Therm Inj. 1988;14:239–240.
-
- Vandeput J, Nelissen M, Tanner JC, Boswick J. A review of skin meshers. Burns 1995;21:364–370.
-
- Fifer TD, Pieper D, Hawtof D. Contraction rates of meshed, nonexpanded split-thickness skin grafts versus split-thickness sheet grafts. Ann Plast Surg. 1993;31:162–163.
-
- Lumenta DB, Kamolz LP, Frey M. Adult burn patients with more than 60% TBSA involved-Meek and other techniques to overcome restricted skin harvest availability: The Viennese Concept. J Burn Care Res. 2009;30:231–242.
-
- Erba P, Ogawa R, Vyas R, Orgill DP. The reconstructive matrix: A new paradigm in reconstructive plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:492–498.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources