Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy
- PMID: 21704449
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.021
Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous needle core biopsy has become established in the management of small renal masses ≤ 4 cm (SRMs). Recent series have reported success rates of ≥ 80%. Nondiagnostic results continue to be problematic.
Objective: To determine the results of SRM biopsy and the outcomes of nondiagnostic biopsy and repeat biopsy.
Design, setting, and participants: Patients undergoing renal tumor biopsy (RTB) for suspected renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were included in a prospectively maintained database.
Measurements: The database was analyzed retrospectively to determine the pathology and outcomes of SRM biopsy. Outcomes of patients with nondiagnostic biopsy were determined. Patients undergoing repeat biopsy were identified and their outcomes analyzed.
Results and limitations: Three hundred forty-five biopsies were performed (mean diameter: 2.5 cm). Biopsy was diagnostic in 278 cases (80.6%) and nondiagnostic in 67 cases (19.4%). Among diagnostic biopsies, 221 (79.4%) were malignant, 94.1% of which were RCC. Histologic subtyping and grading of RCC was possible in 88.0% and 63.5% of cases, respectively. Repeat biopsy was performed in 12 of the 67 nondiagnostic cases, and a diagnosis was possible in 10 (83.3%). Eight lesions were malignant and two were oncocytic neoplasms. Pathology was available for 15 masses after initial nondiagnostic biopsy; 11 (73%) were malignant. Larger tumor size and a solid nature on imaging predicted a successful biopsy on multivariate analysis. Grade 1 complications were experienced in 10.1% of cases, with no major bleeding and no seeding of the biopsy tract. There was one grade 3a complication (0.3%). This is a retrospective study and some data are unavailable on factors that may affect biopsy success rates. Repeat biopsy was not standard practice prior to this analysis.
Conclusions: RTB can be performed safely and accurately in the investigation of renal masses ≤ 4 cm. A nondiagnostic biopsy should not be considered a surrogate for the absence of malignancy. Repeat biopsy can be performed with similar accuracy, providing a diagnosis for most patients.
Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Re: Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy.J Urol. 2012 Jan;187(1):81. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.130. Epub 2011 Nov 25. J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22153420 No abstract available.
-
Re: Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy.J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):66-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.063. Epub 2012 May 12. J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22682818 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Image-guided biopsy-diagnosed renal cell carcinoma: critical appraisal of technique and long-term follow-up.Eur Urol. 2007 May;51(5):1289-95; discussion 1296-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.022. Epub 2006 Oct 25. Eur Urol. 2007. PMID: 17081679
-
The value of preoperative needle core biopsy for diagnosing benign lesions among small, incidentally detected renal masses.J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4):1257-61; discussion 1261. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.030. Epub 2008 Aug 15. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18707712
-
Percutaneous core biopsy of small renal mass lesions: a diagnostic tool to better stratify patients for surgical intervention.BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4 Pt B):E146-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11384.x. Epub 2012 Jul 13. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 22805186
-
The current role of percutaneous needle biopsies of renal tumours.Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2009 Jun;81(2):107-12. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2009. PMID: 19760866 Review.
-
Biopsy of a renal mass: where are we now?Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Sep;19(5):447-53. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32832f0d5a. Curr Opin Urol. 2009. PMID: 19571757 Review.
Cited by
-
'Hybrid' oncocytoma: collecting duct (Bellini) carcinoma-the peril from this extremely rare intratumoural coexistence.BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Apr 26;14(4):e241091. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-241091. BMJ Case Rep. 2021. PMID: 33906887 Free PMC article.
-
Urine aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2 differentiate renal carcinomas from other imaged renal masses and bladder and prostate cancer.Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Jan;90(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.10.005. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015. PMID: 25572193 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Apr;14(2):116-23. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0309-x. Curr Urol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23344685 Review.
-
Active surveillance of small renal masses.Nat Rev Urol. 2013 May;10(5):266-74. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.62. Epub 2013 Apr 9. Nat Rev Urol. 2013. PMID: 23567498 Review.
-
Can we Avoid the Unnecessary Loss of nephrons in the Management of Small Solid Renal Masses? Additional Clinical Parameters to Predict Benign-malign Distinction.Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2021 Mar 17;55(1):53-61. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2019.95770. eCollection 2021. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2021. PMID: 33935536 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical