Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;18(2):88-93.
doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.031302. Epub 2011 Jun 24.

Emergency department coding of bicycle and pedestrian injuries during the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10

Affiliations

Emergency department coding of bicycle and pedestrian injuries during the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10

M Karkhaneh et al. Inj Prev. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The international classification of diseases version 10 (ICD-10) uses alphanumeric expanded codes and external cause of injury codes (E-codes).

Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of emergency department (ED) coders in applying E-codes in ICD-9 and -10.

Methods: Bicycle and pedestrian injuries were identified from the ED information system from one period before and two periods after transition from ICD-9 to -10 coding. Overall, 180 randomly selected bicycle and pedestrian injury charts were reviewed as the reference standard (RS). Original E-codes assigned by ED coders (ICD-9 in 2001 and ICD-10 in 2004 and 2007) were compared with charts (validity) and also to ICD-9 and -10 codes assigned from RS chart review, to each case by an independent (IND) coder (reliability). Sensitivity, specificity, simple, and chance-corrected agreements (κ statistics) were calculated.

Results: Sensitivity of E-coding bicycle injuries by the IND coder in comparison with the RS ranged from 95.1% (95% CI 86.3 to 99.0) to 100% (95% CI 94.0 to 100.0) for both ICD-9 and -10. Sensitivity of ED coders in E-coding bicycle injuries ranged from 90.2% (95% CI 79.8 to 96.3) to 96.7% (95% CI 88.5 to 99.6). The sensitivity estimates for the IND coder ranged from 25.0% (95% CI 14.7 to 37.9) to 45.0% (95% CI 32.1 to 58.4) for pedestrian injuries for both ICD-9 and -10.

Conclusion: Bicycle injuries are coded in a reliable and valid manner; however, pedestrian injuries are often miscoded as falls. These results have important implications for injury surveillance research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of missed/misclassified E-codes by emergency department (ED) coders for bicycle (bike) and pedestrian (ped) injuries in three EDs in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Frequency of missed/misclassified E-codes by independent coder for bicycle (bike) and pedestrian (ped) injuries in three emergency departments in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dennis J, Potter B, Ramsay T, et al. The effects of provincial bicycle helmet legislation on helmet use and bicycle ridership in Canada. Inj Prev 2010;16:219–24 - PubMed
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information Head Injuries in Canada: A Decade of Change (1994-1995 to 2003-2004). Ottawa, Ontario Canada, 2006. https://secure.cihi.ca/estore/productbrowse.htm?locale=en&Lang=en-US (accessed Sep 2009).
    1. Linn S, Smith D, Sheps S. Epidemiology of bicycle injury, head injury, and helmet use among children in British Columbia: a five year descriptive study. Inj Prev 1998;4:122–5 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander S, Conner T, Slaughter T. Overview of inpatient coding. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003;60(21 Suppl 6):S11–14 - PubMed
    1. Smith SM, Colwell LS, Jr, Sniezek JE. An evaluation of external cause-of-injury codes using hospital records from the Indian Health Service, 1985. Am J Public Health 1990;80:279–81 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms