Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1990 Aug;9(1):41-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF00167067.

Accelerated fractionation radiotherapy for hospitalized glioblastoma multiforme patients with poor prognostic factors

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Accelerated fractionation radiotherapy for hospitalized glioblastoma multiforme patients with poor prognostic factors

J C Hernandez et al. J Neurooncol. 1990 Aug.

Abstract

The standard 6 week course of post-operative radiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme (astrocytoma grade IV) is lengthy, considering the poor prognosis. The standard schedule is especially unsuitable for hospitalized patients and for those with poor prognostic factors (such as old age and poor performance status) since their survival is particularly short. In order to improve the survival-treatment time ratio, we entered a total of 14 hospitalized patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and poor prognostic factors (mean age 62, mean KPS 57%) into a Phase I trial of accelerated fractionation (AF) external beam radiotherapy. A total tumor dose of 5400-5500 cGy was given in 3 weeks: 4300-4500 cGy whole brain using 100 cGy tid fractions on weekdays plus a 900-1200 cGy boost using single daily fractions of 150-200 cGy on weekends. Only one patient entered did not complete therapy, due to the development of pulmonary embolism resulting in death. Mean survival for all 14 patients from the time of surgical diagnosis was 30.4 weeks. The schedule was well tolerated and resulted in a substantial decrease in treatment time compared to conventional fractionation in these patients. AF schedules should continue to be explored since they may be more appropriate than conventional fractionation schedules for GBM patients with poor prognostic factors, particularly when hospitalized.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1980 Dec 4;303(23):1323-9 - PubMed
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1976 Jul-Aug;1(7-8):639-44 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1982 Dec 1;50(11):2301-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Cancer. 1978 Aug;14(8):851-6 - PubMed
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979 Oct;5(10):1733-40 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources