Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;37(5):1258-63.
doi: 10.1037/a0023923.

The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks

Affiliations

The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks

Vanessa M Loaiza et al. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Recent research in working memory has highlighted the similarities involved in retrieval from complex span tasks and episodic memory tasks, suggesting that these tasks are influenced by similar memory processes. In the present article, the authors manipulated the level of processing engaged when studying to-be-remembered words during a reading span task (Experiment 1) and an operation span task (Experiment 2) in order to assess the role of retrieval from secondary memory during complex span tasks. Immediate recall from both span tasks was greater for items studied under deep processing instructions compared with items studied under shallow processing instructions regardless of trial length. Recall was better for deep than for shallow levels of processing on delayed recall tests as well. These data are consistent with the primary-secondary memory framework, which suggests that to-be-remembered items are displaced from primary memory (i.e., the focus of attention) during the processing phases of complex span tasks and therefore must be retrieved from secondary memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Performance at immediate and delayed recall as a type of processing at encoding for Experiment 1, using reading span task.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Immediate and delayed recall performance as a function of type of processing at encoding for Experiment 2, using the operation span task.

References

    1. Baddeley AD (1986). Working memory. New York, NY: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
    1. Barrouillet P, Bernardin S, & Camos V (2004). Time constraints and resource sharing in adults’ working memory spans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 83–100. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.83 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Conway ARA, Kane MJ, Bunting MF, Hambrick DZ, Wilhelm O, & Engle RW (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786. doi:10.3758/BF03196772 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cowan N, Elliott EM, Saults JS, Morey CC, Mattox S, Hismjatullina A, & Conway ARA (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 42–100. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.12.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craik FIM, & Tulving E (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 - DOI