Coevolution and maladaptation
- PMID: 21708731
- DOI: 10.1093/icb/42.2.381
Coevolution and maladaptation
Abstract
Many of the most commonly cited examples of exquisite adaptation are of coevolved symbioses. As we learn more about the coevolutionary process, however, it is becoming increasingly evident that coevolution may also keep populations moderately maladapted much of the time. As a result, coevolving populations may only rarely occupy adaptive peaks, because the selective landscape is under continual change through reciprocal selection on the species themselves. These shifting patterns of coadaptation are further shaped by the geographic structure of most species. Selection mosaics across landscapes and coevolutionary hotspots can favor different evolutionary trajectories in different populations. The combined action of gene flow, random genetic drift, and local extinction of populations may then continually remold these local patterns, creating a geographic mosaic in the degrees of maladaptation found within local interactions. Recent mathematical models of the geographic mosaic of coevolution suggest that complex mosaics of maladaptation are a likely consequence of spatially structured species interactions. These models indicate that the spatial structure of maladaptation may depend upon the type of coevolutionary interaction, the underlying selection mosaic, and patterns of gene flow across landscapes. By maintaining local polymorphisms and driving the divergence of populations, coevolution may produce spatial patterns of maladaptation that are a source of ongoing innovation and diversification in species interactions.
Similar articles
-
Parasite local adaptation in a geographic mosaic.Evolution. 2006 Jan;60(1):24-30. Evolution. 2006. PMID: 16568628
-
Coevolutionary clines across selection mosaics.Evolution. 2000 Aug;54(4):1102-15. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00546.x. Evolution. 2000. PMID: 11005280
-
Coevolution Creates Complex Mosaics across Large Landscapes.Am Nat. 2019 Aug;194(2):217-229. doi: 10.1086/704157. Epub 2019 Jun 21. Am Nat. 2019. PMID: 31318284
-
Dos and don'ts of testing the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution.Heredity (Edinb). 2007 May;98(5):249-58. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800949. Epub 2007 Mar 7. Heredity (Edinb). 2007. PMID: 17344805 Review.
-
Ongoing coevolution in mycorrhizal interactions.New Phytol. 2010 Jul;187(2):286-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03305.x. Epub 2010 May 28. New Phytol. 2010. PMID: 20524992 Review.
Cited by
-
Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy.Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011 Feb;9(2):119-30. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2504. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011. PMID: 21233850 Review.
-
Shedding Light on the African Enigma: In Vitro Testing of Homo sapiens-Helicobacter pylori Coevolution.Microorganisms. 2021 Jan 25;9(2):240. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020240. Microorganisms. 2021. PMID: 33503840 Free PMC article.
-
A theoretical quantitative genetic study of negative ecological interactions and extinction times in changing environments.BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Apr 25;8:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-119. BMC Evol Biol. 2008. PMID: 18439269 Free PMC article.
-
Community coalescence: an eco-evolutionary perspective.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 May 11;375(1798):20190252. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0252. Epub 2020 Mar 23. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32200752 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tipping the Scale Toward Gastric Disease: A Host-Pathogen Genomic Mismatch?Curr Genet Med Rep. 2018 Dec;6(4):199-207. doi: 10.1007/s40142-018-0153-x. Epub 2018 Oct 10. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2018. PMID: 30775159 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials