Coevolution and maladaptation
- PMID: 21708731
- DOI: 10.1093/icb/42.2.381
Coevolution and maladaptation
Abstract
Many of the most commonly cited examples of exquisite adaptation are of coevolved symbioses. As we learn more about the coevolutionary process, however, it is becoming increasingly evident that coevolution may also keep populations moderately maladapted much of the time. As a result, coevolving populations may only rarely occupy adaptive peaks, because the selective landscape is under continual change through reciprocal selection on the species themselves. These shifting patterns of coadaptation are further shaped by the geographic structure of most species. Selection mosaics across landscapes and coevolutionary hotspots can favor different evolutionary trajectories in different populations. The combined action of gene flow, random genetic drift, and local extinction of populations may then continually remold these local patterns, creating a geographic mosaic in the degrees of maladaptation found within local interactions. Recent mathematical models of the geographic mosaic of coevolution suggest that complex mosaics of maladaptation are a likely consequence of spatially structured species interactions. These models indicate that the spatial structure of maladaptation may depend upon the type of coevolutionary interaction, the underlying selection mosaic, and patterns of gene flow across landscapes. By maintaining local polymorphisms and driving the divergence of populations, coevolution may produce spatial patterns of maladaptation that are a source of ongoing innovation and diversification in species interactions.
Similar articles
-
Parasite local adaptation in a geographic mosaic.Evolution. 2006 Jan;60(1):24-30. Evolution. 2006. PMID: 16568628
-
Coevolutionary clines across selection mosaics.Evolution. 2000 Aug;54(4):1102-15. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00546.x. Evolution. 2000. PMID: 11005280
-
Coevolution Creates Complex Mosaics across Large Landscapes.Am Nat. 2019 Aug;194(2):217-229. doi: 10.1086/704157. Epub 2019 Jun 21. Am Nat. 2019. PMID: 31318284
-
Dos and don'ts of testing the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution.Heredity (Edinb). 2007 May;98(5):249-58. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800949. Epub 2007 Mar 7. Heredity (Edinb). 2007. PMID: 17344805 Review.
-
Ongoing coevolution in mycorrhizal interactions.New Phytol. 2010 Jul;187(2):286-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03305.x. Epub 2010 May 28. New Phytol. 2010. PMID: 20524992 Review.
Cited by
-
The geographic mosaic of arms race coevolution is closely matched to prey population structure.Evol Lett. 2020 Jun 9;4(4):317-332. doi: 10.1002/evl3.184. eCollection 2020 Aug. Evol Lett. 2020. PMID: 32774881 Free PMC article.
-
Process rather than pattern: finding pine needles in the coevolutionary haystack.J Biol. 2008;7(5):14. doi: 10.1186/jbiol75. Epub 2008 May 28. J Biol. 2008. PMID: 18510785 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Can local adaptation research in plants inform selection of native plant materials? An analysis of experimental methodologies.Evol Appl. 2016 Oct 4;9(10):1219-1228. doi: 10.1111/eva.12379. eCollection 2016 Dec. Evol Appl. 2016. PMID: 27877201 Free PMC article.
-
Predictable patterns of trait mismatches between interacting plants and insects.BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Jul 7;10:204. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-204. BMC Evol Biol. 2010. PMID: 20604973 Free PMC article.
-
Co-structure analysis and genetic associations reveal insights into pinworms (Trypanoxyuris) and primates (Alouatta palliata) microevolutionary dynamics.BMC Ecol Evol. 2021 Oct 20;21(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12862-021-01924-4. BMC Ecol Evol. 2021. PMID: 34670486 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials