Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011;33(1):148-64.
doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr008. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

Genetic screening

Affiliations
Review

Genetic screening

Wylie Burke et al. Epidemiol Rev. 2011.

Abstract

Current approaches to genetic screening include newborn screening to identify infants who would benefit from early treatment, reproductive genetic screening to assist reproductive decision making, and family history assessment to identify individuals who would benefit from additional prevention measures. Although the traditional goal of screening is to identify early disease or risk in order to implement preventive therapy, genetic screening has always included an atypical element-information relevant to reproductive decisions. New technologies offer increasingly comprehensive identification of genetic conditions and susceptibilities. Tests based on these technologies are generating a different approach to screening that seeks to inform individuals about all of their genetic traits and susceptibilities for purposes that incorporate rapid diagnosis, family planning, and expediting of research, as well as the traditional screening goal of improving prevention. Use of these tests in population screening will increase the challenges already encountered in genetic screening programs, including false-positive and ambiguous test results, overdiagnosis, and incidental findings. Whether this approach is desirable requires further empiric research, but it also requires careful deliberation on the part of all concerned, including genomic researchers, clinicians, public health officials, health care payers, and especially those who will be the recipients of this novel screening approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996. Methodology. xxxix–v.
    1. Moskowitz SM, Chmiel JF, Sternen DL, et al. CFTR-related disorders (GeneReview) Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine; 2008. ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1250/). (Accessed December 24, 2010)
    1. Cao A, Galanello R. Beta-thalassemia (GeneReview) Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine; 2010. ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1426/). (Accessed December 24, 2010)
    1. Bender MA, Hobbs W. Sickle cell disease (GeneReview) Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine; 2009. ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1377/). (Accessed December 24, 2010)
    1. Au KS, Ashley-Koch A, Northrup H. Epidemiologic and genetic aspects of spina bifida and other neural tube defects. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2010;16(1):6–15. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types