Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: what is optimal for bone regeneration?
- PMID: 21714966
- DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.008
Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: what is optimal for bone regeneration?
Abstract
Bone repair is a multi-dimensional process that requires osteogenic cells, an osteoconductive matrix, osteoinductive signalling, mechanical stability and vascularization. In clinical practice, bone substitute materials are being used for reconstructive purposes, bone stock augmentation, and bone repair. Over the last decade, the use of calcium phosphate (CaP) based bone substitute materials has increased exponentially. These bone substitute materials vary in composition, mechanical strength and biological mechanism of function, each having their own advantages and disadvantages. It is known that intrinsic material properties of CaP bone substitutes have a profound effect on their mechanical and biological behaviour and associated biodegradation. These material properties of bone substitutes, such as porosity, composition and geometry change the trade-off between mechanical and biological performance. The choice of the optimal bone substitutes is therefore not always an easy one, and largely depends on the clinical application and its associated biological and mechanical needs. Not all bone graft substitutes will perform the same way, and their performance in one clinical site may not necessarily predict their performance in another site. CaP bone substitutes unfortunately have yet to achieve optimal mechanical and biological performance and to date each material has its own trade-off between mechanical and biological performance. This review describes the effect of intrinsic material properties on biological performance, mechanical strength and biodegradability of CaP bone substitutes.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: any specific needs?Injury. 2011 Sep;42 Suppl 2:S56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Jul 12. Injury. 2011. PMID: 21752369 Review.
-
Preparation, degradation, and calcification of biodegradable polyurethane foams for bone graft substitutes.J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003 Dec 1;67(3):813-27. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.10148. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003. PMID: 14613229
-
Design and characterization of a novel chitosan/nanocrystalline calcium phosphate composite scaffold for bone regeneration.J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Feb;88(2):491-502. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31878. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009. PMID: 18306307
-
Review paper: behavior of ceramic biomaterials derived from tricalcium phosphate in physiological condition.J Biomater Appl. 2008 Nov;23(3):197-212. doi: 10.1177/0885328208096798. J Biomater Appl. 2008. PMID: 18996965 Review.
-
How bone forms in large cancellous defects: critical analysis based on experimental work and literature.Injury. 2011 Sep;42 Suppl 2:S47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 13. Injury. 2011. PMID: 21742327
Cited by
-
Supplementation with 45S5 Bioactive Glass Reduces In Vivo Resorption of the β-Tricalcium-Phosphate-Based Bone Substitute Material Vitoss.Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 30;20(17):4253. doi: 10.3390/ijms20174253. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31480285 Free PMC article.
-
Inflammatory macrophages facilitate mechanical stress-induced osteogenesis.Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Feb 25;12(4):3617-3625. doi: 10.18632/aging.102833. Epub 2020 Feb 25. Aging (Albany NY). 2020. PMID: 32096768 Free PMC article.
-
Porous polylactic acid scaffolds for bone regeneration: A study of additively manufactured triply periodic minimal surfaces and their osteogenic potential.J Tissue Eng. 2020 Nov 6;11:2041731420956541. doi: 10.1177/2041731420956541. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. J Tissue Eng. 2020. PMID: 33224463 Free PMC article.
-
Positive Effect of Cold Atmospheric Nitrogen Plasma on the Behavior of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Cultured on a Bone Scaffold Containing Iron Oxide-Loaded Silica Nanoparticles Catalyst.Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jul 3;21(13):4738. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134738. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32635182 Free PMC article.
-
Fast-Versus Slow-Resorbable Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute Materials-Texture Analysis after 12 Months of Observation.Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 1;13(17):3854. doi: 10.3390/ma13173854. Materials (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32882883 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous