Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Aug;34(8):1804-8.
doi: 10.2337/dc11-0182. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

Improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of rapid-acting insulin using needle-free jet injection technology

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of rapid-acting insulin using needle-free jet injection technology

Elsemiek E C Engwerda et al. Diabetes Care. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Insulin administered by jet injectors is dispensed over a larger subcutaneous area than insulin injected with a syringe, which may facilitate a more rapid absorption. This study compared the pharmacologic profile of administration of insulin aspart by jet injection to that by conventional insulin pen.

Research design and methods: Euglycemic glucose clamp tests were performed in 18 healthy volunteers after subcutaneous administration of 0.2 units/kg body wt of aspart, either administered by jet injection or by conventional pen, using a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, cross over study design. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles were derived from the glucose infusion rate (GIR) needed to maintain euglycemia and from plasma insulin levels, respectively.

Results: The time to maximal GIR was significantly shorter when insulin was injected with the jet injector compared with conventional pen administration (51 ± 3 vs. 105 ± 11 min, P < 0.0001). The time to peak insulin concentration was similarly reduced (31 ± 3 vs. 64 ± 6 min, P < 0.0001) and peak insulin concentrations were increased (108 ± 13 vs. 79 ± 7 mU/L, P = 0.01) when insulin was injected by jet injection compared with conventional pen injection. Jet injector insulin administration reduced the time to 50% glucose disposal by ∼40 min (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in maximal GIR, total insulin absorption, or total insulin action between the two devices.

Conclusions: Administration of insulin aspart by jet injection enhances insulin absorption and reduces the duration of glucose-lowering action. This profile resembles more closely the pattern of endogenous insulin secretion and may help to achieve better meal insulin coverage and correction of postprandial glucose excursions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean GIR after administration of rapid-acting insulin by the jet injector (closed symbols, black line) or the conventional insulin pen (open symbols, dashed line) during the euglycemic glucose clamp.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean plasma insulin levels after administration of rapid-acting insulin by the jet injector (closed symbols, black line) or the conventional insulin pen (open symbols, dashed line) during the euglycemic glucose clamp.

References

    1. Mitragotri S. Current status and future prospects of needle-free liquid jet injectors. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2006;5:543–548 - PubMed
    1. Weller C, Linder M. Jet injection of insulin vs the syringe-and-needle method. JAMA 1966;195:844–847 - PubMed
    1. Taylor R, Home PD, Alberti KG. Plasma free insulin profiles after administration of insulin by jet and conventional syringe injection. Diabetes Care 1981;4:377–379 - PubMed
    1. Pehling GB, Gerich JE. Comparison of plasma insulin profiles after subcutaneous administration of insulin by jet spray and conventional needle injection in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin Proc 1984;59:751–754 - PubMed
    1. Hallé JP, Lambert J, Lindmayer I, et al. Twice-daily mixed regular and NPH insulin injections with new jet injector versus conventional syringes: pharmacokinetics of insulin absorption. Diabetes Care 1986;9:279–282 - PubMed

Publication types