Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Aug;17(4):323-7.
doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328348bf6f.

Acute pain management of patients with multiple fractured ribs: a focus on regional techniques

Affiliations
Review

Acute pain management of patients with multiple fractured ribs: a focus on regional techniques

Anthony M-H Ho et al. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Thoracic trauma leading to multiple fractured ribs (MFR) remains very common. Good analgesia may help to improve a patient's respiratory mechanics and to avoid intubation of the trachea for ventilatory support and therefore may dramatically alter the course of recovery. We herein review the analgesia options for patients with MFR.

Recent findings: For healthy patients with one to two fractured ribs, systemic analgesics may suffice. For more than three to four fractured ribs, studies and experience have reaffirmed the superior analgesia made possible with thoracic epidural, thoracic paravertebral, and intercostal blocks. From experience, interpleural block has significant drawbacks. Catheterization allows the continuation of analgesia for 2 or more days with just one block. Use of the landmark technique is usually satisfactory for accurate block placement but ultrasound and nerve stimulation are showing promise in further improving needle and catheter placement accuracy, especially in the presence of difficult anatomy.

Summary: Thoracic epidural, thoracic paravertebral, and intercostal blocks are the top choices for patients with MFR and they are of equivalent efficacy. Each has unique advantages and disadvantages. Our preference tends to be the thoracic paravertebral approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances