Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Jan 15;118(2):333-41.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.26295. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

Underascertainment of radiotherapy receipt in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Underascertainment of radiotherapy receipt in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data

Reshma Jagsi et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data have been used to suggest underuse and disparities in receipt of radiotherapy. Prior studies have cautioned that SEER may underascertain radiotherapy but lacked adequate representation to assess whether underascertainment varies by geography or patient sociodemographic characteristics. The authors sought to determine rates and correlates of underascertainment of radiotherapy in recent SEER data.

Methods: The authors evaluated data from 2290 survey respondents with nonmetastatic breast cancer, aged 20 to 79 years, diagnosed from June of 2005 to February 2007 in Detroit and Los Angeles and reported to SEER registries (73% response rate). Survey responses regarding treatment and sociodemographic factors were merged with SEER data. The authors compared radiotherapy receipt as reported by patients versus SEER records. The authors then assessed correlates of radiotherapy underascertainment in SEER.

Results: Of 1292 patients who reported receiving radiotherapy, 273 were coded as not receiving radiotherapy in SEER (underascertained). Underascertainment was more common in Los Angeles than in Detroit (32.0% vs 11.25%, P < .001). On multivariate analysis, radiotherapy underascertainment was significantly associated in each registry (Los Angeles, Detroit) with stage (P = .008, P = .026), income (P < .001, P = .050), mastectomy receipt (P < .001, P < .001), chemotherapy receipt (P < .001, P = .045), and diagnosis at a hospital that was not accredited by the American College of Surgeons (P < .001, P < .001). In Los Angeles, additional significant variables included younger age (P < .001), nonprivate insurance (P < .001), and delayed receipt of radiotherapy (P < .001).

Conclusions: SEER registry data as currently collected may not be an appropriate source for documentation of rates of radiotherapy receipt or investigation of geographic variation in the radiation treatment of breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Source of Analyzed Sample
This flow diagram details the way in which the analytic sample was developed.

References

    1. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. About SEER. Accessed online at http://seer.cancer.gov/about/ on 07/30/2010.
    1. Yu JB, Gross CP, Wilson LD, Smith BD. NCI SEER public-use data: applications and limitations in oncology research. Oncology. 2009;23(3):288–95. - PubMed
    1. Farrow DC, Hunt WC, Samet JM. Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer. NEJM. 1992;326(17):1097–101. - PubMed
    1. Nattinger AB, Hoffman RG, Kneusel RT, Schapira MM. Relation between appropriateness of primary therapy for early-stage breast carcinoma and increased use of breast-conserving surgery. The Lancet. 2000;356:1148–53. - PubMed
    1. SEER Program Coding and Staging Manual 2010. [Accessed online on 2/11/11]; at http://seer.cancer.gov/manuals/2010/SPCSM_2010_maindoc.pdf.

Publication types