Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 May;166(1):98-109.
doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01571.x.

Consequences of splice variation on Secretin family G protein-coupled receptor function

Affiliations
Review

Consequences of splice variation on Secretin family G protein-coupled receptor function

Sebastian G B Furness et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2012 May.

Abstract

The Secretin family of GPCRs are endocrine peptide hormone receptors that share a common genomic organization and are the subject of a wide variety of alternative splicing. All GPCRs contain a central seven transmembrane domain responsible for transducing signals from the outside of the cell as well as extracellular amino and intracellular carboxyl termini. Members of the Secretin receptor family have a relatively large N-terminus and a variety of lines of evidence support a common mode of ligand binding and a common ligand binding fold. These receptors are best characterized as coupling to intracellular signalling pathways via G(αs) and G(αq) but are also reported to couple to a multitude of other signalling pathways. The intracellular loops are implicated in regulating the interaction between the receptor and heterotrimeric G protein complexes. Alternative splicing of exons encoding both the extracellular N-terminal domain as well as the extracellular loops of some family members has been reported and as expected these splice variants display altered ligand affinity as well as differential activation by endogenous ligands. Various forms of alternative splicing have also been reported to alter intracellular loops 1 and 3 as well as the C-terminus and as one might expect these display differences in signalling bias towards downstream effectors. These diverse pharmacologies require that the physiological role of these splice variants be addressed but should provide unique opportunities for drug design and development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of the genomic organization of Secretin family GPCRs. Boxes indicate coding exons and are scaled according to amino acid length coded by each exon. The relative location of exons with respect to the overall receptor fold is depicted. The location of transmembrane helices is indicated in red (exon spanning helices shown with pink insert) and ICLs in blue.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Alignment of the extracellular N-termini of Secretin family GPCRs. Amino acids encoded by alternative exons are shown in alternating black and blue text with amino acids encoded by two exons shown in red text. Predicted signal peptides are highlighted as italicized, underlined text. The six conserved cysteine residues are highlighted by red background and have the cysteine number indicated below the alignment. The disulphide bonding pattern for all receptors is 1–4, 2–5 and 3–6. The other conserved residues are highlighted in purple. Above the alignment alpha helices are indicated with H, beta strands with B and beta turns with T.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cartoon depicting overall topology of Secretin family GPCRs. The N-terminal domain is shown in red with the seven transmembrane bundle in green. The relative locations of AS reported for the family are shown. N-terminal domain exchange is a feature of CRF2α, CRF2β and CRF2γ. CRF1, PAC1 and Secretin receptors have 3rd exon deletion variants. PAC1 has both N-terminal and ICL3 insert variants. CT receptor has variants with ICL1 insert, ECL1 insert and exon 13 deletion and CRF1 has an ICL1 insert variant.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic of the genomic organization of PAC1 receptor indicating the human splice variants discussed in this review. The top most exon pattern labelled all shows all coding exons for human PAC1; however, we are not aware of a splice variant that incorporates all these exons. Boxes indicate coding exons and are scaled according to amino acid length coded by each exon. The relative location of exons with respect to the overall receptor fold is depicted. The location of transmembrane helices is indicated in red (exon spanning helices shown with pink insert) and ICLs in blue.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albrandt K, Mull E, Brady EM, Herich J, Moore CX, Beaumont K. Molecular cloning of two receptors from rat brain with high affinity for salmon calcitonin. FEBS Lett. 1993;325:225–232. - PubMed
    1. Alonso V, Ardura JA, Wang B, Sneddon WB, Friedman PA. A naturally occurring isoform inhibits parathyroid hormone receptor trafficking and signaling. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:143–155. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ardati A, Goetschy V, Gottowick J, Henriot S, Valdenaire O, Deuschle U, et al. Human CRF2 alpha and beta splice variants: pharmacological characterization using radioligand binding and a luciferase gene expression assay. Neuropharmacology. 1999;38:441–448. - PubMed
    1. Bazarsuren A, Grauschopf U, Wozny M, Reusch D, Hoffmann E, Schaefer W, et al. In vitro folding, functional characterization, and disulfide pattern of the extracellular domain of human GLP-1 receptor. Biophys Chem. 2002;96:305–318. - PubMed
    1. Bergwitz C, Gardella TJ, Flannery MR, Potts JT, Kronenberg HM, Goldring SR, et al. Full activation of chimeric receptors by hybrids between parathyroid hormone and calcitonin. Evidence for a common pattern of ligand-receptor interaction. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:26469–26472. - PubMed

Publication types