Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;40(2):127-33.
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02633.x.

Evaluation of the difference between intended and measured ablation and its impact on refractive outcomes of the wavefront optimize profile and the S001 Wellington nomogram in myopic spherocylindrical corrections

Affiliations

Evaluation of the difference between intended and measured ablation and its impact on refractive outcomes of the wavefront optimize profile and the S001 Wellington nomogram in myopic spherocylindrical corrections

Georgios Labiris et al. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the level of agreement between intended and measured ablation of the wavefront optimize profile corrected by the Wellington nomogram in myopic spherocylindrical corrections and assess its impact on refractive outcomes.

Design: Prospective, university-institute setting.

Participants: Eighty-six participants (86 eyes for photorefractive keratectomy group) and 86 participants (86 eyes for laser in situ keratomileusis group) recruited in a consecutive-if -eligible basis.

Methods: Differences between intended and measured ablation were evaluated with Scheimpflug camera. Refractive outcomes were evaluated by means of postoperative spherical equivalent, postoperative defocus equivalent, contrast sensitivity, correction index, difference vector and index of success.

Main outcome measures: Correlation of visual outcomes with intended ablation.

Results: Both groups demonstrated significant over-ablations (16.7±8.5, P<0.001 & 11.8±18.5, P<0.001, respectively). Intended ablation was the primary determinant of the measured difference (r-square 0.769 & 0.765, respectively). Photorefractive keratectomy corrections over 100µ had significant impact on postoperative spherical equivalent, postoperative defocus equivalent, correction index, difference vector and index of success (P=0.044, P=0.05, P=0.019, P=0.016, P=0.006, respectively), but laser in situ keratomileusis corrections over 100µ had significant impact only on postoperative defocus equivalent, difference vector and index of success (P=0.04, P=0.05).

Conclusions: The results suggest that the wavefront optimize profile seems to over-ablate corneal tissue both in photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Over-ablation exerts significant impact on refractive outcomes only in high spherocylindrical corrections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources