Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul-Aug;5(4):264-70.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jun 12.

Radiation dose reduction with increasing utilization of prospective gating in 64-multidetector cardiac computed tomography angiography

Affiliations

Radiation dose reduction with increasing utilization of prospective gating in 64-multidetector cardiac computed tomography angiography

Tae-Young Choi et al. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Medical radiation exposure is a major concern, and several methods have been proposed to reduce radiation doses in multidetector cardiac computed tomography (CT).

Objective: The purpose of this study was to review radiation doses of clinical cardiac CT performed at our center and to evaluate the effect of radiation dose reduction strategies on the median dose delivered to patients over time.

Methods: This study included 623 consecutive clinical patients (male, 58%) who were referred for imaging. The effective dose (mSv) was derived from the product of the dose-length-product (DLP) and a conversion coefficient for the chest (0.014).

Results: The median radiation dose of all patients was 3.0 mSv (interquartile range [IQR], 1.9-8.1 mSv). A significant difference was observed in radiation dose between the prospective (n = 384) and retrospective (n = 239) gating groups (2.0 vs 9.6 mSv; P < 0.0001). Compared with patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; n = 52), patients without CABG had significantly lower median radiation dose (prospective gating: 2.0 vs 3.4 mSv, P < 0.0001; retrospective gating: 9.3 vs 10.3 mSv, P < 0.0001). In patients with CABG, a significant difference was observed in radiation dose between prospective and retrospective gating (3.4 vs 10.3; P < 0.0001). The median radiation doses per month at our center decreased from 6.2 to 2.1 mSv over time with increasing use of prospective gating (≤91%).

Conclusion: Radiation reduction techniques have led to progressive decreases in radiation exposure over time, primarily because of prospective gating.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms