Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):229-35.
doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.82573.

Short bowel syndrome: a review of management options

Affiliations
Review

Short bowel syndrome: a review of management options

Prasad Seetharam et al. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Extensive resection of the intestinal tract frequently results in inadequate digestion and/or absorption of nutrients, a condition known as short bowel syndrome (SBS). This challenging condition demands a dedicated multidisciplinary team effort to overcome the morbidity and mortality in these patients. With advances in critical care management, more and more patients survive the immediate morbidity of massive intestinal resection to present with SBS. Several therapies, including parenteral nutrition (PN), bowel rehabilitation and surgical procedures to reconstruct bowel have been used in these patients. Novel dietary approaches, pharmacotherapy and timely surgical interventions have all added to the improved outcome in these patients. However, these treatments only partially correct the underlying problem of reduced bowel function and have limited success resulting in 30% to 50% mortality rates. However, increasing experience and encouraging results of intestinal transplantation has added a new dimension to the management of SBS. Literature available on SBS is exhaustive but inconclusive. We conducted a review of scientific literature and electronic media with search terms 'short bowel syndrome, advances in SBS and SBS' and attempted to give a comprehensive account on this topic with emphasis on the recent advances in its management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. DiBaise JK, Young RJ, Vanderhoof JA. Intestinal rehabilitation and the short bowel syndrome: Part 1. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1386–95. - PubMed
    1. Thompson JS. Comparison of massive vs.repeated resection leading to the short bowel syndrome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:101–4. - PubMed
    1. Messing B, Crenn P, Beau P, Boutron-Ruault MC, Rambaud JC, Matuchansky C. Long-term survival and parenteral nutrition dependence in adult patients with the short bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:1043–50. - PubMed
    1. Thompson JS, DiBaise JK, Iver KR, Yeats M, Sudan DL. Postoperative short bowel syndrome. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:85–9. - PubMed
    1. Andersson H, Bosaeus I, Brummer RJ, Fasth S, Hultén L, Magnusson O, Strauss B. Nutritional and metabolic consequences of extensive bowel resection. Dig Dis. 1986;4:193–202. - PubMed