Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jul 5:12:149.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-149.

Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation

Karen R Sepucha et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: A high quality decision requires that patients who meet clinical criteria for surgery are informed about the options (including non-surgical alternatives) and receive treatments that match their goals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical sensibility of a patient self report instrument, to measure the quality of decisions about total joint replacement for knee or hip osteoarthritis.

Methods: The performance of the Hip/Knee Osteoarthritis Decision Quality Instrument (HK-DQI) was evaluated in two samples: (1) a cross-sectional mail survey with 489 patients and 77 providers (study 1); and (2) a randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid with 138 osteoarthritis patients considering total joint replacement (study 2). The HK-DQI results in two scores. Knowledge items are summed to create a total knowledge score, and a set of goals and concerns are used in a logistic regression model to develop a concordance score. The concordance score measures the proportion of patients whose treatment matched their goals. Hypotheses related to acceptability, feasibility, reliability and validity of the knowledge and concordance scores were examined.

Results: In study 1, the HK-DQI was completed by 382 patients (79%) and 45 providers (58%), and in study 2 by 127 patients (92%), with low rates of missing data. The DQI-knowledge score was reproducible (ICC = 0.81) and demonstrated discriminant validity (68% decision aid vs. 54% control, and 78% providers vs. 61% patients) and content validity. The concordance score demonstrated predictive validity, as patients whose treatments were concordant with their goals had more confidence and less regret with their decision compared to those who did not.

Conclusions: The HK-DQI is feasible and acceptable to patients. It can be used to assess whether patients with osteoarthritis are making informed decisions about surgery that are concordant with their goals.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wennberg J, Fisher E, Skinner J. Geography and the debate over Medicare reform. Health Affairs. 2002. pp. W94–114. - PubMed
    1. Sepucha K, Fowler FJ, Mulley AG. Policy support for patient-centered care: The need for measurable improvements in decision quality. Health Affairs. 2004. pp. VAR54–62. - PubMed
    1. Comparative Effectiveness Research Position Statement. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2011. http://www.aaos.org/about/papers/position/1178.asp Accessed May 17, 2011.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001. - PubMed
    1. Weinstein JNC, Clay K, Morgan TS. Informed patient choice: Patient-centered valuing of surgical risks and benefits. Health Affairs. 2007;26:726–30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.726. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms