Self-collected mid-turbinate swabs for the detection of respiratory viruses in adults with acute respiratory illnesses
- PMID: 21731708
- PMCID: PMC3121745
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021335
Self-collected mid-turbinate swabs for the detection of respiratory viruses in adults with acute respiratory illnesses
Abstract
Background: The gold standard for respiratory virus testing is a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab, which is collected by a healthcare worker. Midturbinate (MT) swabs are an alternative due to their ease of collection and possible self-collection by patients. The objective of this study was to compare the respiratory virus isolation of flocked MT swabs compared to flocked NP swabs.
Methods: Beginning in October 2008, healthy adults aged 18 to 69 years were recruited into a cohort and followed up for symptoms of influenza. They were asked to have NP and MT swabs taken as soon as possible after the onset of a fever or two or more respiratory symptoms with an acute onset. The swabs were tested for viral respiratory infections using Seeplex® RV12 multiplex PCR detection kit. Seventy six pairs of simultaneous NP and MT swabs were collected from 38 symptomatic subjects. Twenty nine (38%) of these pairs were positive by either NP or MT swabs or both. Sixty nine (91%) of the pair results were concordant. Two samples (3%) for hCV OC43/HKU1 and 1 sample (1%) for rhinovirus A/B were positive by NP but negative by MT. One sample each for hCV 229E/NL63, hCV OC43/HKU1, respiratory syncytial virus A, and influenza B were positive by MT but negative by NP.
Conclusions: Flocked MT swabs are sensitive for the diagnosis of multiple respiratory viruses. Given the ease of MT collection and similar results between the two swabs, it is likely that MT swabs should be the preferred method of respiratory cell collection for outpatient studies. In light of this data, larger studies should be performed to ensure that this still holds true and data should also be collected on the patient preference of collection methods.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and nasopharyngeal wash collection methods for respiratory virus detection in hospitalized children using real-time polymerase chain reaction.J Virol Methods. 2012 Oct;185(1):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Jun 21. J Virol Methods. 2012. PMID: 22728277 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior nasal swabs compared to nasopharyngeal swabs for detection of respiratory viruses in children.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Jul;112(3):116821. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.116821. Epub 2025 Mar 20. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 40153904
-
Concordance between RT-PCR-based detection of respiratory viruses from nasal swabs collected for viral testing and nasopharyngeal swabs collected for bacterial testing.J Clin Virol. 2014 Jul;60(3):309-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 29. J Clin Virol. 2014. PMID: 24875136 Free PMC article.
-
Non-invasive sample collection for respiratory virus testing by multiplex PCR.J Clin Virol. 2011 Nov;52(3):210-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Aug 19. J Clin Virol. 2011. PMID: 21855405 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Upper Airway Swab Collection for Detection of Viral and Bacterial Pathogens by Individuals or Caregivers Compared to Health Care Workers.J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jun 18;59(7):e0230420. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02304-20. Epub 2021 Jun 18. J Clin Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33468606 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Advances in the Rapid Diagnostic of Viral Respiratory Tract Infections.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Feb 10;12:807253. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.807253. eCollection 2022. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35252028 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of detection rate of 16 sampling methods for respiratory viruses: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of clinical data and systematic review.BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov;5(11):e003053. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003053. BMJ Glob Health. 2020. PMID: 33168521 Free PMC article.
-
Isolation, Sequence, Infectivity, and Replication Kinetics of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;26(9):2054-2063. doi: 10.3201/eid2609.201495. Epub 2020 Jun 19. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32558639 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) on Self-Collected Nasal Swab Compared With Professionally Collected Nasopharyngeal Swab.Cureus. 2022 Jun 3;14(6):e25618. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25618. eCollection 2022 Jun. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35784954 Free PMC article.
-
Use of an improved quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay to determine differences in human rhinovirus viral loads in different populations.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;74(4):384-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.08.023. Epub 2012 Sep 25. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 23017257 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Forman MS, Valsamakis A. Specimen collection, transport, and processing: Virology. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 2007. 1290
-
- Greenberg SB, Krilov LR. Laboratory diagnosis of respiratory disease. In: Drew WL, Rubin SJ, editors. Cumitech 21. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 1986.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous