Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;2(6):48.
doi: 10.1258/shorts.2011.011030. Epub 2011 Jun 13.

A randomized questionnaire-based study on the impact of providing numerical information on colorectal cancer screening

Affiliations

A randomized questionnaire-based study on the impact of providing numerical information on colorectal cancer screening

Imran M Patanwala et al. JRSM Short Rep. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To establish whether the provision of numerical data using pictograms and framed as event rates affects subjects' attitudes to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

Design: Randomized questionnaire and telephone study comparing a control group given standard NHS CRC information leaflets with an intervention group given the same leaflet but enhanced with additional numerical and pictorial information.

Setting: District General hospital and two general practices in North East England. Study carried out immediately prior to the introduction of CRC screening.

Participants: A total of 478 non-gastroenterological subjects (age range 60-70 years).

Main outcome measures: The difference in the two groups' overall wish to be screened; comparison of the impact of enhanced vs. unenhanced summary points in the NHS information leaflet; the summary point that most influenced their decision on screening; the views of the intervention group on the additional numerical and pictorial information provided.

Results: A total of 256 (54%) responded (124 from the control group and 117 from the intervention group); 22% were interviewed by telephone; 90% of the control group and 85% of the intervention group wished to be screened (P = 0.34). Provision of numerical and pictorial information significantly changed the impact of five of the six summary points on the decision to be screened. Sixty-two percent of the intervention group found the pictograms helpful while 83% of those interviewed by telephone found the numerical data helpful; 73% of the control group when given by telephone the additional numerical information given to the intervention group said this would have been useful in aiding their decision-making.

Conclusion: Providing additional numerical information would enhance the credibility of the screening programme without necessarily reducing the numbers screened.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Information shown to the control group, as in the standard NHS information pack
Figure 2
Figure 2
Information shown to the intervention group containing the information shown to the control group embellished with additional numerical information and pictograms

References

    1. Palin J Helping patients understand risk: 7 Simple Strategies for Successful Communication. 2nd edn [city of publisher]: The Risk Communication Institute, 2006
    1. Hewitson P, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Towler B, Watson E Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(1):CD001216 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1365–71 - PubMed
    1. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MHE, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996;348:1472–7 - PubMed
    1. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jørgensen OD, Søndergaard O Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 1996;348:1467–71 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources