Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;2(2):67-71.
doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.80370.

Plagiarism: Why is it such a big issue for medical writers?

Natasha Das  1 , Monica Panjabi
Affiliations

Plagiarism: Why is it such a big issue for medical writers?

Natasha Das et al. Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Plagiarism is the wrongful presentation of somebody else's work or idea as one's own without adequately attributing it to the source. Most authors know that plagiarism is an unethical publication practice. Yet, it is a serious problem in the medical writing arena. Plagiarism is perhaps the commonest ethical issue plaguing medical writing. In this article, we highlight the different types of plagiarism and address the issues of plagiarism of text, plagiarism of ideas, mosaic plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and duplicate publication. An act of plagiarism can have several repercussions for the author, the journal in question and the publication house as a whole. Sometimes, strict disciplinary action is also taken against the plagiarist. The article cites examples of retraction of articles, suspension of authors, apology letters from journal editors, and other such actions against plagiarism.

Keywords: Action against plagiarism; duplicate publication; medical writing; plagiarism; unethical publication practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World Association of Medical Editors. Publication ethics policies for medical journals. Available from: http://wwwwameorg/resources/publication-ethics-policies-for-medical-jour... [last accessed on 2009 Jul 31]
    1. Memis D, Inal MT, Temizoz O, Genchallac H, Ozdemir H, Sut N. The effect of celiac plexus block in critically ill patients intolerant of enteral nutrition: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:1071–5. - PubMed
    1. Bhatnagar S, Gupta D, Mishra S, Thulkar S, Chauhan H. Bedside ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis with bilateral paramedian needle entry technique can be an effective pain control technique in advanced upper abdominal cancer pain. J Palliat Med. 2008;11:1195–9. - PubMed
    1. Shafer SL. Notice of retraction. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1561. - PubMed
    1. Bhatnagar S. Request for retraction. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1560. - PubMed