INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing
- PMID: 21733166
- PMCID: PMC3152523
- DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-169
INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing
Abstract
Background: Urinary incontinence is an important health problem to the individual sufferer and to health services. Stress and stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence are increasingly managed by surgery due to advances in surgical techniques. Despite the lack of evidence for its clinical utility, most clinicians undertake invasive urodynamic testing (IUT) to confirm a functional diagnosis of urodynamic stress incontinence before offering surgery for this condition. IUT is expensive, embarrassing and uncomfortable for women and carries a small risk. Recent systematic reviews have confirmed the lack of high quality evidence of effectiveness.The aim of this pilot study is to test the feasibility of a future definitive randomised control trial that would address whether IUT alters treatment decisions and treatment outcome in these women and would test its clinical and cost effectiveness.
Methods/design: This is a mixed methods pragmatic multicentre feasibility pilot study with four components:-(a) A multicentre, external pilot randomised trial comparing basic clinical assessment with non-invasive tests and IUT. The outcome measures are rates of recruitment, randomisation and data completion. Data will be used to estimate sample size necessary for the definitive trial.(b) Qualitative interviews of a purposively sampled sub-set of women eligible for the pilot trial will explore willingness to participate, be randomised and their overall trial experience.(c) A national survey of clinicians to determine their views of IUT in this context, the main outcome being their willingness to randomise patients into the definitive trial.(d) Qualitative interviews of a purposively sampled group of these clinicians will explore whether and how they use IUT to inform their decisions.
Discussion: The pilot trial will provide evidence of feasibility and acceptability and therefore inform the decision whether to proceed to the definitive trial. Results will inform the design and conduct of the definitive trial and ensure its effectiveness in achieving its research aim.
Trial registration number: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN71327395 assigned 7th June 2010.
Similar articles
-
INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): a mixed-methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women.Health Technol Assess. 2015 Feb;19(15):1-273, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta19150. Health Technol Assess. 2015. PMID: 25714493 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I study.Trials. 2015 Sep 8;16:400. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0928-2. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26350343 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Assessing professional equipoise and views about a future clinical trial of invasive urodynamics prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a survey within a mixed methods feasibility study.Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Nov;31(8):1223-30. doi: 10.1002/nau.22328. Epub 2012 Sep 28. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012. PMID: 23023322 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic self-reporting of adverse events for patients undergoing cancer treatment: the eRAPID research programme including two RCTs.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2022 Feb. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2022 Feb. PMID: 35138783 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Urodynamic studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 29;2013(10):CD003195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003195.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24166676 Free PMC article.
-
Trial participation as avoidance strategy: a qualitative study.Health Expect. 2016 Dec;19(6):1346-1354. doi: 10.1111/hex.12437. Epub 2016 Jan 5. Health Expect. 2016. PMID: 26730890 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding variations in patient screening and recruitment in a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial: a vignette-based study.Trials. 2016 Oct 26;17(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1652-2. Trials. 2016. PMID: 27782847 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Urogynecology digest Presented by Aparna Hegde.Int Urogynecol J. 2015 May;26(5):765-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2605-5. Int Urogynecol J. 2015. PMID: 25600352 No abstract available.
-
Invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women: cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses in the context of a mixed methods feasibility study.Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Mar 23;4:67. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0255-y. eCollection 2018. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018. PMID: 29588862 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Clark A, Lapitan M, Nelson R, Sillen U. In: ICUD-ICS-SIU 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence. 3. Abrams P, Khoury S, Cardozo L, Wein A, editor. Plymouth, UK: Health Publications; 2005. Epidemiology of urinary and feacal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse; pp. 255–312.
-
- Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trondelag. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000;53(11):1150–7. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00232-8. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Martin JL, Williams KS, Abrahams KR, Turner DA, Sutton A, Chapple C, Assessa R, Cheater F. Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence. Health Technology Assessments. 2006. Report No.: 6 Contract No.: 6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical