Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec 23;7(6):863-5.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0458. Epub 2011 Jul 6.

Long-term cleaner fish presence affects growth of a coral reef fish

Affiliations

Long-term cleaner fish presence affects growth of a coral reef fish

Gillian E Clague et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

Cleaning behaviour is considered to be a classical example of mutualism. However, no studies, to our knowledge, have measured the benefits to clients in terms of growth. In the longest experimental study of its kind, over an 8 year period, cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus were consistently removed from seven patch reefs (61-285 m(2)) and left undisturbed on nine control reefs, and the growth and parasite load of the damselfish Pomacentrus moluccensis determined. After 8 years, growth was reduced and parasitic copepod abundance was higher on fish from removal reefs compared with controls, but only in larger individuals. Behavioural observations revealed that P. moluccensis cleaned by L. dimidiatus were 27 per cent larger than nearby conspecifics. The selective cleaning by L. dimidiatus probably explains why only larger P. moluccensis individuals benefited from cleaning. This is the first demonstration, to our knowledge, that cleaners affect the growth rate of client individuals; a greater size for a given age should result in increased fecundity at a given time. The effect of the removal of so few small fish on the size of another fish species is unprecedented on coral reefs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Fish growth of P. moluccensis, derived from the regression of log fish standard length (SL) and log age, from reefs with (black circles, solid line) and without (white circles, dashed line) cleaner fish L. dimidiatus. Annual ages were jittered to reveal underlying data. Arrows indicate outliers omitted. Sample sizes in brackets.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Parasitic copepod juveniles on P. moluccensis, summed across 10 fish sampled per reef, compared with mean fish SL per reef on reefs with (black circles) and without (white circles) cleaner fish L. dimidiatus.

References

    1. Stachowicz J. J. 2001. Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities. BioScience 51, 235–246 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0235:MFATSO]2.0.CO;2 (doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0235:MFATSO]2.0.CO;2) - DOI
    1. Grutter A. S., Irving A. D. 2007. Positive interactions in marine communities. In Marine ecology (eds Connell S. D., Gillanders B. M.), pp. 110–137 Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
    1. Bshary R., Grutter A. S. 2006. Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature 441, 975–978 10.1038/nature04755 (doi:10.1038/nature04755) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grutter A. S. 1997. Spatiotemporal variation and feeding selectivity in the diet of the cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus. Copeia 1997, 346–355 10.2307/1447754 (doi:10.2307/1447754) - DOI
    1. Grutter A. S. 1996. Experimental demonstration of no effect by the cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus (Cuvier and Valenciennes) on the host fish Pomacentrus moluccensis (Bleeker). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 196, 285–298 10.1016/0022-0981(95)00135-2 (doi:10.1016/0022-0981(95)00135-2) - DOI

Publication types