Error awareness and antisaccade performance
- PMID: 21735247
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2770-4
Error awareness and antisaccade performance
Abstract
In the antisaccade task, healthy participants often make errors by saccading towards the sudden onset target, despite instructions to saccade to the mirror image location. One interesting and relatively unexplored feature of antisaccade performance is that participants are typically unaware of a large proportion of the errors they make. Across two experiments, we explored the extent to which error awareness is altered by manipulations known to affect antisaccade error rate. In experiment 1, participants performed the antisaccade task under standard instructions, instructions to respond as quickly as possible or instructions to delay responding. Delay instructions significantly reduced antisaccade error rate compared to the other instructions, but this reduction was driven by a decrease only in the number of errors that participants were aware of-the number of errors of which participants were unaware remained constant across instruction condition. In experiment 2, participants performed antisaccades alone, or concurrently with two different distractor tasks-spatial tapping and random number generation task. Both the dual task conditions increased the number of errors of which participants were aware, but again, unaware error rates remained unchanged. These results are discussed in the light of recent models of antisaccade performance and the role of conscious awareness in error correction.
Similar articles
-
The effects of task instructions on pro and antisaccade performance.Exp Brain Res. 2009 May;195(1):5-14. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1750-4. Epub 2009 Mar 13. Exp Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19283372
-
The mirror antisaccade task: direction-amplitude interaction and spatial accuracy characteristics.Exp Brain Res. 2006 Sep;174(2):304-11. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0462-2. Epub 2006 Apr 25. Exp Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16636790
-
Mixed pro and antisaccade performance in children and adults.Brain Res. 2009 Feb 19;1255:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.006. Epub 2008 Dec 11. Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19103183 Clinical Trial.
-
Is the relationship of prosaccade reaction times and antisaccade errors mediated by working memory?Exp Brain Res. 2011 Feb;208(3):385-97. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2488-8. Epub 2010 Nov 25. Exp Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21107543
-
Performance errors influence voluntary task choices.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Jun;48(6):665-688. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000991. Epub 2022 May 5. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022. PMID: 35511545 Review.
Cited by
-
Back to basics: The effects of block vs. interleaved trial administration on pro- and anti-saccade performance.PLoS One. 2017 Feb 21;12(2):e0172485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172485. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28222173 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources