Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul 6;2011(7):CD008405.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008405.pub2.

Interventions to manage dual practice among health workers

Suzanne N Kiwanuka  1 , Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Christine Nalwadda, Olico Okui, Freddie Ssengooba, Alison A Kinengyere, George W Pariyo
Affiliations

Interventions to manage dual practice among health workers

Suzanne N Kiwanuka et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Dual practice, whereby health workers hold two or more jobs, is a common phenomenon globally. In resource constrained low- and middle-income countries dual practice poses an ongoing threat to the efficiency, quality and equity of health services, especially in the public sector. Identifying effective interventions to manage dual practice is important.

Objectives: To assess the effects of regulations implemented to manage dual practice.

Search strategy: Databases searched included: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 2011, Issue 4, part of The Cochrane Library. www.thecochranelibrary.com, including the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Specialised Register (searched 26 May 2011); MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations May 24, 2011 (searched 26 May 2011); MEDLINE, Ovid (1948 to May week 2 2011) (searched 26 May 2011); EMBASE, Ovid (1980 to 2011 week 20) (searched 26 May 2011); Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index, ISI Web of Science (1975 to present) (searched 04 December 2009); LILACS (searched January 2010); and AIM (December 2009) (searched 18 December 2009).

Selection criteria: Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted-time-series studies. Dual practice was defined as holding more than one job. Studies for inclusion were those focusing on interventions to manage dual practice among health professionals employed in the public health sector.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently applied the criteria for inclusion and exclusion of studies when scanning the identified titles and abstracts. The same two review authors independently screened full reports of selected citations. At each stage, results were compared and discrepancies settled through discussion.

Main results: No studies were found which were eligible for inclusion in this review.

Authors' conclusions: There is a need to rigorously evaluate the effects of interventions implemented to manage dual practice among health workers. However, there is still much that is unknown about dual practice itself. The designing of studies to evaluate the effects of interventions to manage dual practice could benefit from prior studies to assess the various manifestations of dual practice, their prevalence and their likely impacts on health services delivery. These findings would then inform the design of studies to evaluate interventions to manage dual practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known

Update of

References

Additional references

Asiimwe 1997
    1. Asiimwe D, McPake B, Mwesigye F, Ofoumbi M, Ortenblan L, Streefland P, et al. The private sector activities of public sector health workers in Uganda. Private health providers in developing countries. Serving the public interest?. St. Martin's Press, October 1997:140‐57.
Bentes 2004
    1. Bentes M, Dias CM, Sakellarides C, Bankauskaite V. Health care systems in transition: Portugal. WHO Regional Office for Europe on Behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies 2004.
Berman 2004
    1. Berman P, Cuizon D. Multiple public‐private jobholding of health care providers in developing countries: an exploration of theory and evidence. DFID Health Systems Resource Centre 2004.
Bian 2003
    1. Bian Y, Sun Q, Jan S, Yu J, Meng Q. Dual practice by public health providers in Shandong and Sichuan Province, China. Health economics and financing programme working paper 07/03. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 2003.
Biglaiser 2007
    1. Biglaiser G, Ma CT. Moonlighting: Public service and private practice. Rand Journal of Economics 2007;38:1113‐33.
Brown 2006
    1. Brown P, Brunnhuber K, Chalkiduo K, Chalmers I, Clake M, Fenton M, et al. How to formulate research recommendations. BMJ 2006;333:804‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Delay 2004
    1. Delay S, Gilson L, Hemson K, Lewin M, Motimele M, Scott R, Wadee H. Non‐State Providers of Basic Services: South Africa: Study of Non‐State Providers of Basic Services. Policy Division, Department for International Development (DFID), UK 2004.
Eggleston 2006
    1. Eggleston K, Bir A. Physician dual practice. Health Policy 2006;78:157‐66. - PubMed
European Observatory on Health Systems Policy 2004
    1. European Observatory on Health Systems Policies, Grosse‐Tebbe S, Figueras J, editors. Snapshots of health systems: the state of affairs in 16 countries in summer 2004. 2004. WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2004.
Ferrinho 2004
    1. Ferrinho P, Omar MC, Fernandes M, Blaise P, Bugalho AM, Lerberghe WV. Pilfering for survival: how health workers use access to drugs as a coping strategy. BioMed Central: Human Resources for Health 2004;2(1):4. - PMC - PubMed
Flood 2001
    1. Flood CM, Archibald T. The illegality of private health care in Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2001;164:825‐30. - PMC - PubMed
Garcia‐Prado 2007
    1. Garcia‐Prado A, Gonzalez P. Policy and regulatory responses to dual practice in the health sector. Health Policy 2007;84:142‐52. - PubMed
Gonzalez 2004
    1. Gonzélez P. Should physicians dual practice be limited? An incentive approach. Health Economics 2004;13:505‐24. - PubMed
Gruen 2002
    1. Gruen R, Anwar R, Begum T, Killingsworth J, Normand C. Dual job holding practitioners in Bangladesh: an exploration. Social Science and Medicine 2002;54:267‐79. - PubMed
Humphrey 2004
    1. Humphrey C, Russell J. Motivation and values of hospital consultants in south east England who work in the National Health Service and do private practice. Social Science and Medicine 2004;59:1241‐50. - PubMed
Jumpa 2007
    1. Jumpa M, Jan S, Mills A. The role of regulation in influencing income‐generating activities among public sector doctors in Peru. BioMed Central: Human Resources for Health 2007;5:5. - PMC - PubMed
Mossialos 2005
    1. Mossialos E, Allin S, Davaki K. Analysing the Greek health system: a tale of fragmentation and inertia. Health Economics 2005;14:151‐68. - PubMed
Oliveira 2005
    1. Oliveira M, Magone JM, Pereira JA. Non‐decision making and inertia in Portuguese health policy. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2005;30:221‐30. - PubMed
Rickman 1999
    1. Rickman N, McGuire A. Regulating providers reimbursement in a mixed market for health care. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 1999;46:53‐71.
Roenen 1997
    1. Roenen C. How African doctors make ends meet: an exploration. Tropical Medicine and International Health 1997;2(2):127‐35. - PubMed
Saether 2003
    1. Saether EM. A discrete choice analysis of Norwegian physicians labour supply and sector choice. University of Oslo working paper 2003; Vol. 19.
Sandier 2004
    1. Sandier S, Paris V, Polton D. Health care systems in transition: France. WHO Regional Office for Europe on Behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies 2004.
Stepan 2005
    1. Stepan J, Sommersguter‐Reichmann M. Monitoring political decision making and its impact in Austria. Health Economics 2005;14 Suppl 1:7‐23. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources