Aromatherapy for pain management in labour
- PMID: 21735438
- PMCID: PMC12333927
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009215
Aromatherapy for pain management in labour
Abstract
Background: Many women would like to avoid pharmacological or invasive methods of pain management in labour and this may contribute towards the popularity of complementary methods of pain management. This review examined currently available evidence supporting the use of aromatherapy for pain management in labour.
Objectives: To examine the effects of aromatherapy for pain management in labour on maternal and perinatal morbidity.
Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 October 2010), The Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field's Trials Register (October 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to 31 October 2010), CINAHL (1980 to 31 October 2010), the Australian and New Zealand Trials Registry (31 October 2010), Chinese Clinical Trial Register (31 October 2010), Current Controlled Trials (31 October 2010), ClinicalTrials.gov (31 October 2010), ISRCTN Register (31 October 2010), National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) (31 October 2010) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (31 October 2010).
Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials comparing aromatherapy with placebo, no treatment or other non-pharmacological forms of pain management in labour.
Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information.
Main results: We included two trials (535 women) in the review. The trials found no difference between groups for the primary outcomes of pain intensity, assisted vaginal birth (risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 2.28, one trial, 513 women; RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.06 to 11.70, one trial, 22 women), and caesarean section (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.94, one trial, 513 women; RR 2.54, 95% CI 0.11 to 56.25, one trial, 22 women); there were more babies admitted to neonatal intensive care in the control group of one trial (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.42, one trial, 513 women) but this difference did not reach statistical significance. The trials found no differences between groups for the secondary outcomes of use of pharmacological pain relief (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.32, one trial, 513 women; RR 2.50, 95% CI 0.31 to 20.45, one trial, 22 women), spontaneous vaginal delivery (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.06, one trial, 513 women; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.28, one trial, 22 women) or length of labour and augmentation (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.45, one trial, 513 women). The risk of bias was low in the trials.
Authors' conclusions: There is a lack of studies evaluating the role of aromatherapy for pain management in labour. Further research is needed before recommendations can be made for clinical practice.
Conflict of interest statement
None known.
Figures














References
References to studies included in this review
Burns 2007 {published data only}
-
- Burns E, Zobbi V, Panzeri D, Oskrochi R, Regalia A. Aromatherapy in childbirth: a pilot randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obsetrics and Gynaecology 2007;114:838‐44. - PubMed
Calvert 2000 {unpublished data only}
-
- Calvert I. Ginger: an essential oil for shortening labour?. Practising Midwife 2005;8(1):30‐4. - PubMed
-
- Calvert I. The evaluation of the use of herbal substances in the bath water of labouring women. Personal communication 2000.
References to studies awaiting assessment
Hur 2003 {published data only}
-
- Hur MH, Park MH. Effects of aromatherapy on labor process, labor pain, labor stress response and neonatal status of primipara: randomized clinical trial. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003;46(4):776‐83.
Salem 2004 {published data only}
-
- Salem SG. The effect of music on pain during the first stage of labor in Egypt [thesis]. Case Western Reserve University, 2004.
References to ongoing studies
Vakilian 2009 {published data only}
-
- Vakilian K. The effect of breath technique and aromatherapy by essence of Lavender on labor pain. IRCT. Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials. (http://www.irct.ir/searchresult.php?id=1557&number=2) (accessed November 2010).
Walker 2010 {published data only}
-
- Walker DM. Effects of aromatherapy on childbirth. ClinicalTrIals.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01051726) (accessed November 2010).
Additional references
Adams 2009
-
- Adams J, Lui CW, Sibbritt D, Broom A, Wardle J, Homer C, et al. Women's use of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy: a critical review of the literature. Birth 2009;36(3):237‐45. - PubMed
Allaire 2000
-
- Allaire AD, Moos M, Wells SR. Complementary and alternative medicine in pregnancy: a survey of North Carolina nurse‐midwives. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2000;95(1):19‐23. - PubMed
Anim‐Somuah 2005
Barnes 2004
-
- Barnes PM, Powell‐Griner E, McFann K, Nahin RL. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Advance Data 2004; Vol. 343:1‐19. [PUBMED: 15188733] - PubMed
Barragán 2006
Bennett 1999
-
- Bennett VR, Brown LK. Myles textbook for Midwives. 13th Edition. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1999.
Burns 1999
-
- Burns E, Blamey C, Ersser SJ, Lloyd AJ, Barneston L. The use of aromatherapy in intrapartum midwifery practice. An evaluative study. Oxford centre for health research & development. Report No 7. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, 1999.
Burns 2000
-
- Burns E, Blamey C, Ersser S, Barnetson L, Lloyd A. An investigation into the use of aromatherapy in intrapartum midwifery practice. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 2000;2:141‐7. - PubMed
Cluett 2009
Derry 2011
Dowswell 2009
Egger 1997
Eisenberg 1998
-
- Eisenberg DA, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilky S, Rompay M. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990‐1997: results of a follow up national survey. JAMA 1998;280:1569‐75. - PubMed
Harbord 2006
-
- Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JA. A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 2006;25(20):3443‐57. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
-
- Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Leap 1997
-
- Leap N. A midwifery perspective on pain in labour [MSC Thesis]. London: South Bank University, 1997.
Manheimer 2008
-
- Manheimer E, Berman B. Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Fields) 2008, Issue 2.
Melzack 1984
-
- Melzack R. The myth of painless childbirth. Pain 1984;19:331‐7. - PubMed
Melzack 2001
-
- Melzack R. Pain and the neuromatrix in the brain. Journal of Dental Education 2001;65:1378‐82. - PubMed
Neilson 2011a
Neilson 2011b
Othman 2011
RevMan 2011 [Computer program]
-
- The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
Simkin 2004
-
- Simkin P, Bolding A. Update on nonpharmacological approaches to relieve labor pain and prevent suffering. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2004;49(6):489‐504. - PubMed
Simmons 2007
Smith 2011
-
- Smith CA, Collins CT, Crowther CA, Levett KM. Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in press. - PubMed
Stevensen 1995
-
- Stevensen CJ. The psychophysiological effects of aromatherapy massage following cardiac surgery. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 1995;2:27‐35.
Tillett 2010
-
- Tillett J. The use of aromatherapy in women's health. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing 2010;24(3):238‐45. - PubMed
Tiran 2000
-
- Tiran D. Clinical Aromatherapy for Pregnancy and Childbirth. Second Edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
Trout 2004
-
- Trout KK. The neuromatrix theory of pain: implications for selected nonpharmacological methods of pain relief for labor. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2004;49(6):482‐8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources