Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Jul 6:(7):CD009231.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009231.

Hospital at home: home-based end of life care

Sasha Shepperd  1 , Bee Wee, Sharon E Straus
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Hospital at home: home-based end of life care

Sasha Shepperd et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: The policy in a number of countries is to provide people with a terminal illness the choice of dying at home. This policy is supported by surveys indicating that the general public and patients with a terminal illness would prefer to receive end of life care at home.

Objectives: To determine if providing home-based end of life care reduces the likelihood of dying in hospital and what effect this has on patients' symptoms, quality of life, health service costs and care givers compared with inpatient hospital or hospice care.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library) to October 2009, Ovid MEDLINE(R) 1950 to March 2011, EMBASE 1980 to October 2009, CINAHL 1982 to October 2009 and EconLit to October 2009. We checked the reference lists of articles identified for potentially relevant articles.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials, interrupted time series or controlled before and after studies evaluating the effectiveness of home-based end of life care with inpatient hospital or hospice care for people aged 18 years and older.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. We combined the published data for dichotomous outcomes using fixed-effect Mantel-Haenszel meta-analysis. When combining outcome data was not possible we presented the data in narrative summary tables.

Main results: We included four trials in this review. Those receiving home-based end of life care were statistically significantly more likely to die at home compared with those receiving usual care (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.55, P = 0.0002; Chi (2) = 1.72, df = 2, P = 0.42, I(2) = 0% (three trials; N=652)). We detected no statistically significant differences for functional status (measured by the Barthel Index), psychological well-being or cognitive status, between patients receiving home-based end of life care compared with those receiving standard care (which included inpatient care). Admission to hospital while receiving home-based end of life care varied between trials and this was reflected by high levels of statistically significant heterogeneity in this analysis. There was some evidence of increased patient satisfaction with home-based end of life care, and little evidence of the impact this form of care has on care givers.

Authors' conclusions: The evidence included in this review supports the use of end of life home-care programmes for increasing the number of patients who will die at home, although the numbers of patients being admitted to hospital while receiving end of life care should be monitored. Future research should also systematically assess the impact of end of life home care on care givers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

    1. Brumley R, Enguidanot S, Jamison P, Seitz R, Morgenstern N, Saito S, et al. Increased satisfaction with care and lower costs: results of a randomized trial of in-home palliative care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2007;S5:993–1000. - PubMed
    1. Grande G, Farquhar MC, Barclay SIG. Caregiver bereavement outcome: relationship with hospital at home, satisfaction with care and home death. Journal of Palliative Care. 2004;20(2):69–77. - PubMed
    2. Grande GE, Todd CJ, Barclay SI, Farquhar MC. A randomised controlled trial of a hospital at home service for the terminally ill. Palliative Medicine. 2000;14:375–85. - PubMed
    3. Grande GE, Todd CJ, Barclay SI, Farquhar MC. Does hospital at home for palliative care facilitate death at home? Randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1999;319:1472–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hughes SL, Cummings J, Weaver F, Manheim L, Braun B, Conrad K. A randomized trial of the cost effectiveness of VA hospital-based home care for the terminally ill. Health Services Research. 1992;26:801–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jordhøy MS, Fayers P, Saltnes T, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Jannert M, Kaasa S. A palliative care intervention and death at home: a cluster randomized trial. Lancet. 2000;356:888–93. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

    1. Brumley RD, Enguidanos S, Cherin DA. Effectiveness of a home-based palliative care program for end-of-life. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2003;6(5):715–24. - PubMed
    1. Enguidanos SM, Cherin D, Brumley R. Home-based palliative care study: site of death, and costs of medical care for patients with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer. Journal of Social Work in End-of-life & Palliative Care. 2005;1(3):37–56. - PubMed
    1. Hughes SL, Cummings J, Weaver F, Manheim LM, Conrad KJ, Nash K. A randomized trial of Veterans Administration home care for severely disabled veterans. Medical Care. 1990;28(2):135–45. - PubMed
    1. Hughes SL, Weaver FM, Giobbie-Hurder A, Manheim L, Henderson W, Kubal JD, et al. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Home-Based Primary Care. Effectiveness of team-managed home-based primary care: a randomized multicenter trial. JAMA. 2000;284(22):2877–85. - PubMed
    1. McCusker J, Stoddard AM. Effects of an expanding home care program for the terminally ill. Medical Care. 1987;25:373–85. - PubMed

Additional references

    1. Agelopoulos N, Tate T. The Marie Curie Delivering Choice Programme. European Journal of Palliative Care. 2009;16:290–4.
    1. Centeno C, Clark D, Lynch T, Rocafort J, Praill D, de Lima L, et al. Facts and indicators on palliative care development in 52 countries of the WHO European region: results of an EAPC task force. Palliative Medicine. 2007;21:463–71. - PubMed
    1. Chan R, Webster J. End-of-life care pathways for improving outcomes in caring for the dying. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010;(1) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008006.pub2. - PubMed
    1. Cochrane WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10:101–29.
    1. Decker SL, Higginson IJ. A tale of two cities: factors affecting place of cancer death in London and New York. European Journal of Public Health. 2006;17(3):285–90. - PubMed