Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions
- PMID: 21738610
- PMCID: PMC3126798
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions
Abstract
Background: Scientific research in the 21st century is more data intensive and collaborative than in the past. It is important to study the data practices of researchers--data accessibility, discovery, re-use, preservation and, particularly, data sharing. Data sharing is a valuable part of the scientific method allowing for verification of results and extending research from prior results.
Methodology/principal findings: A total of 1329 scientists participated in this survey exploring current data sharing practices and perceptions of the barriers and enablers of data sharing. Scientists do not make their data electronically available to others for various reasons, including insufficient time and lack of funding. Most respondents are satisfied with their current processes for the initial and short-term parts of the data or research lifecycle (collecting their research data; searching for, describing or cataloging, analyzing, and short-term storage of their data) but are not satisfied with long-term data preservation. Many organizations do not provide support to their researchers for data management both in the short- and long-term. If certain conditions are met (such as formal citation and sharing reprints) respondents agree they are willing to share their data. There are also significant differences and approaches in data management practices based on primary funding agency, subject discipline, age, work focus, and world region.
Conclusions/significance: Barriers to effective data sharing and preservation are deeply rooted in the practices and culture of the research process as well as the researchers themselves. New mandates for data management plans from NSF and other federal agencies and world-wide attention to the need to share and preserve data could lead to changes. Large scale programs, such as the NSF-sponsored DataNET (including projects like DataONE) will both bring attention and resources to the issue and make it easier for scientists to apply sound data management principles.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- National Science Foundation. Press release 10-077. Scientists seeking NSF funding will soon be required to submit data management plans. 2010. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=116928. Accessed 2010 Oct 2.
-
- National Academies of Science,Committee on Ensuring the Utility and Integrity of Research Data in a Digital Age. Ensuring the integrity, accessibility, and stewardship of research data in the digital age. 2009. Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12615. Accessed 2010 Oct 5. - PubMed
-
- Hey T, Tansley S, Tole K. The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery. s.l. Microsoft Cooperation. 2009. Available: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/collaboration/fourthparadigm/4th_par.... Accessed 2010 Sep 20.
-
- National Science Foundation, Office of Cyberinfrastructure Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering. Sustainable digital data preservation and access network partners (DataNet) program solicitation - NSF 07-601. 2008. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503141. Accessed 2010 Sep 22.
-
- European Science Foundation. Shared responsibilities in sharing research data: Policies and partnerships. 2007. Available: http://www.esf.org/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&file=fileadmin/be_us.... Accessed 2010 Oct 12.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
